OPINION: A few months after Edward Snowden leaked a tranche of NSA documents to Laura Poitras and Glenn Greenwald, the two journalists, along with Jeremy Scahill, started talking about whether or not they should set up a Kickstarter campaign to fund a new media outlet. While the idea was still percolating, they were informed by a mutual friend of Pierre Omidyar’s that the billionaire was also tossing around the idea of starting a news organization and he was interested in bringing them aboard.
The three of them eventually came to an agreement with Omidyar despite the fact that his company, PayPal, was involved in a banking blockade against WikiLeaks three years prior. In July 2011, fourteen suspected members of Anonymous were arrested in the U.S. on suspicion of taking part in denial-of-service attacks against PayPal during #OpPayback, an online operation that was launched in retaliation for the blockage.
On February 9, 2013, the trio launched an online digital magazine called The Intercept and its co-founders promised “unflinching analysis” and “adversarial journalism.” The media platform was funded by Omidyar under the umbrella of his company, First Look Media.
Eighteen days later, Radack’s client/not client, Daniel Hale, asked Scahill via text messaging if they could meet in the following days. Hale had just printed out six documents marked SECRET and TOP SECRET the day before, all of which were later published by The Intercept.
Approximately five weeks later, on April 5th, Radack committed what appears to be her second criminal offense:
She was arrested and released on her own recognizance just in time to fly to Los Angeles and appear as a guest speaker during the Government Accountability Project’s “American Whistleblower Tour.”
A few days after that she jetted off to New York to celebrate the Polk Awards with Greenwald and Poitras. It was the first time that the duo had returned to the U.S. since they broke Snowden’s NSA story. This picture was taken three days before Radack’s arraignment:
Meanwhile, approximately eleven days after Radack was able to free herself from perhaps the confines of the local police department, neo-Nazi Andrew Auernheimer a.k.a. “Weev” also escaped the clutches of the U.S. justice system.
Weev has been described as a “white supremacist and anti-Semite, as well as a notorious American hacker and online troll.” He also contributes (or did) to the far-right, white supremacist website, Daily Stormer, which “aptly takes its name from the gutter Nazi propaganda sheet known as Der Stürmer.”
On the night of the Polk Awards, he was released from the Allenwood Federal Correction Center and picked up by journalist, Dan Stuckey, and his attorney, Tor Ekeland. Stuckey and journalist Dell Cameron used to co-admin Anonymous’ largest Twitter account, @YourAnonNews, and in 2015, they were seen socializing in a hot tub with none other than Anonymous’ most notorious snitch, Sabu. From my 2018 article, “Under Attack Part Eight: The Syria Files”:
On March 15, 2015, the Anonymous community came to a screeching halt after former Vice journalist Dan Stuckey…along with Dell Cameron and Andrew Blake, posted a Vine of himself and former FBI informant Sabu enjoying a leisurely soak in a hot tub. Sabu is heard saying on the video, ‘I’m with Dan Stuckey. Fuck Anonymous. We’re at fuckin’ Spa Castle. Expect my review soon, bitches!’
Yikes. After Stuckey and Ekeland retrieved Weev, the crew headed back to New York where Ekeland runs his legal practice and celebrated his newfound freedom at a friend’s apartment who had set up a small welcome home party.
According to Bloomberg, at some point during the weekend, Weev attended a party with Greenwald and Poitras but details are lacking so it’s unknown if it’s the same party that allegedly took place at Pilosoft:
Pilosoft is a data center in New York that’s owned by Russian hacker, Aleksandr Pilosov. Krebsonsecurity.com warned everyone about it a year before the Polk Awards::
The most malicious U.S. network listed by Google — a data center run by a company in New York called Pilosoft — is no stranger to lists charting the top sources of badness online. Pilosoft figured prominently in Operation Ghost Click, a U.S. Justice Department takedown targeting the DNS Changer botnet, which had a significant portion of its operations based at Pilosoft. Google says it has scanned 13 percent of Pilosoft’s network, and found that more than half of the sites it scanned were malicious.
Last year, Barrett Brown reported that Weev had allegedly started working for Peter Thiel after his release from prison:
His statement stems from Weev brazenly pressuring one of the PayPal14 defendants named Mercedes Haefer back in 2014. A month after the Polk Awards, he demanded that she tell the other defendants to “stop shit talking PayPal mafia dudes while I talk to them.”
He also told her that Pierre Omidyar was “a friend of a close friend,” so, in other words, Weev appeared to be acting as a middle man for the same guy who purchased PayPal back in 2002 and bankrolled The Intercept, and the PayPal14 who were being prosecuted for disrupting PayPal’s service in response to the company’s banking blockade against WikiLeaks.
While Weev was maybe partying at a sketchy New York data center run by a Russian hacker, Daniel Hale had already started printing out SECRET and TOP SECRETS documents weeks prior. By the time his attorney/not attorney was arrested on a felony charge in early April, he had already printed seven sets of documents, all of which were published by The Intercept in 2015.
One set, which was designated letter “G” in the government’s superseding indictment, was printed just two days before Radack was arrested. Four more sets were printed a week after the Polk Awards. Hale ran his final print job on August 5th and three days later he was raided by the FBI during the filming of Sonia Konnebeck’s film, National Bird.
Radack just happened to be working as general counsel on the film and so after Hale called Konnebeck for help, she put him in touch with Radack. In a recent clip posted by @CodePink, Radack told her audience that Hale “showed up on her doorstep” like this was some sort of shock and awe episode rather than the fairly uneventful sequence of events that actually transpired.
The only shocking part of this story is that Radack had just made a deal with a Virginia prosecutor to reduce her felony down to a misdemeanor one month before the raid took place and it doesn’t seem like anyone knew about it, including Hale.
Disclaimer: Ten thousand more pages of disclaimers to follow.
If you were mentioned in this article because your associate(s) did or said something stupid/dishonest, that’s not a suggestion that you did or said something stupid/dishonest or that you took part in it. Of course, some may conclude on their own that you associate with stupid/dishonest individuals but that’s called having the right to an opinion. If I’ve questioned something that doesn’t make sense to me, that’s not me spinning the confusing material you’ve put out. That’s me trying to make sense out of something that doesn’t make sense. And if I’ve noted that you failed to back up your allegations that means I either missed where you posted it or you failed to back your shiz up.
If I haven’t specifically stated that I believe (my opinion) someone is associated with someone else or an event, then it means just that. I haven’t reported an association nor is there any inference of association on my part. For example, just because someone is mentioned in this article, it doesn’t mean that they’re involved or associated with everyone and everything else mentioned. If I believe that there’s an association between people and/or events, I’ll specifically report it.
If anyone mentioned in this article wants to claim that I have associated them with someone else or an event because I didn’t disclose every single person and event in the world that they are NOT associated with, that’s called gaslighting an audience and it’s absurd hogwash i.e. “They mentioned that I liked bananas but they didn’t disclose that I don’t like apples. Why are they trying to associate me with apples???” Or something similar to this lovely gem, “I did NOT give Trish the thumb drive!” in order to make their lazy audience believe that it was reported they gave Trish the thumb drive when, in fact, that was never reported, let alone inferred.
That’s some of the BS I’m talking about so try not to act like a psychiatric patient, intelligence agent, or paid cyber mercenary by doing these things. If you would like to share your story, viewpoint, or any evidence that pertains to this article, or feel strongly that something needs to be clarified or corrected (again, that actually pertains to the article), you can reach me at email@example.com with any questions or concerns.
I cannot confirm and am not confirming the legitimacy of any messages or emails in this article. Please see a doctor if sensitivity continues. If anyone asks, feel free to tell them that I work for Schoenberger, Fitzgibbon, Steven Biss, the CIA, or really just about any intelligence agency because your idiocy, ongoing defamation, and failure as a human is truly a sight to behold for the rest of us.
If I described you as a fruit basket or even a mental patient it's because that is my opinion of you, it's not a diagnosis. I'm not a psychiatrist nor should anyone take my personal opinions as some sort of clinical assessment. Contact @BellaMagnani if you want a rundown on the psych profile she ran on you.
This is an Op-ed article. The information contained in this post is for general information purposes only. While we endeavor to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information contained on the post for any purpose. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site.
The views or opinions represented in this blog do not represent those of people, institutions or organizations that the owner may or may not be associated with in professional or personal capacity, unless explicitly stated. Any views or opinions are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual.
The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.