True or False: How Much Do You Know About Whistleblowers?

Twitter is still censoring my account by disallowing me to post polls on the platform. The company doesn’t provide any real solutions as to how users can resolve this issue so I’m going to post my questions here.

How Much Do You Know About Whistleblowers?

Question One: Without Googling, espionage charges against Daniel Ellsberg (Pentagon Papers) were dropped because of:
a. First Amendment issue(s)
b. Lack of evidence
c. All of the above
d. None of the above

Question Two: Without Googling, Edward Snowden worked for the CIA prior to being hired by NSA contractor, Booz Allen Hamilton.

True or False?

Question Three: Without Googling, after fleeing the U.S., Edward Snowden went to the South China Morning Post and confirmed U.S. hacking in both Hong Kong and the mainland.

True or False?

Question Four: Without Googling, former CIA analyst and recruiter, John Kiriakou, was charged and convicted for:
a. Exposing the U.S. torture program during an interview
b. Leaking documents about the U.S. torture program
c. Exposing U.S. torture of Abu Zubaydah (waterboarding)
d. Both a. and c.
e. None of the above

Question Five: Without Googling, former DOJ attorney, Jesselyn Radack, was targeted with a searing, job performance review in retaliation for blowing the whistle during the John Walker Lindh case.

True or False?

Question Six: Without Googling, The DOJ/OIG targeted Jesselyn Radack with a criminal investigation in retaliation for blowing the whistle in the John Walker Lindh case.

True or False?

The purpose of these questions is to show activists just how vulnerable they are to propaganda, manufactured narratives, information operations (IO) and the media. And when I say “media,” I’m not talking about right-wing, fanatical news sites. I’m talking about media platforms, usually indie media (and organizations), that promote themselves as liberal and left-wing. In other words, media outlets and journalists that appear supportive of both WikiLeaks and whistleblowers.

It’s also meant to show that false narratives in the so-called “truth and transparency movement” are created and maintained, with the help of the media, over a long period of time, sometimes for decades. Additionally, those who go to great lengths to shape your beliefs are able to successfully re-write history by omitting and/or burying uncomfortable facts.

Post Disclaimer

Disclaimer: Ten thousand more pages of disclaimers to follow.

If you were mentioned in this article because your associate(s) did or said something stupid/dishonest, that’s not a suggestion that you did or said something stupid/dishonest or that you took part in it. Of course, some may conclude on their own that you associate with stupid/dishonest individuals but that’s called having the right to an opinion. If I’ve questioned something that doesn’t make sense to me, that’s not me spinning the confusing material you’ve put out. That’s me trying to make sense out of something that doesn’t make sense. And if I’ve noted that you failed to back up your allegations that means I either missed where you posted it or you failed to back your shiz up.

If I haven’t specifically stated that I believe (my opinion) someone is associated with someone else or an event, then it means just that. I haven’t reported an association nor is there any inference of association on my part. For example, just because someone is mentioned in this article, it doesn’t mean that they’re involved or associated with everyone and everything else mentioned. If I believe that there’s an association between people and/or events, I’ll specifically report it.

If anyone mentioned in this article wants to claim that I have associated them with someone else or an event because I didn’t disclose every single person and event in the world that they are NOT associated with, that’s called gaslighting an audience and it’s absurd hogwash i.e. “They mentioned that I liked bananas but they didn’t disclose that I don’t like apples. Why are they trying to associate me with apples???” Or something similar to this lovely gem, “I did NOT give Trish the thumb drive!” in order to make their lazy audience believe that it was reported they gave Trish the thumb drive when, in fact, that was never reported, let alone inferred.

That’s some of the BS I’m talking about so try not to act like a psychiatric patient, intelligence agent, or paid cyber mercenary by doing these things. If you would like to share your story, viewpoint, or any evidence that pertains to this article, or feel strongly that something needs to be clarified or corrected (again, that actually pertains to the article), you can reach me at with any questions or concerns.

I cannot confirm and am not confirming the legitimacy of any messages or emails in this article. Please see a doctor if sensitivity continues. If anyone asks, feel free to tell them that I work for Schoenberger, Fitzgibbon, Steven Biss, the CIA, or really just about any intelligence agency because your idiocy, ongoing defamation, and failure as a human is truly a sight to behold for the rest of us.

If I described you as a fruit basket or even a mental patient it's because that is my opinion of you, it's not a diagnosis. I'm not a psychiatrist nor should anyone take my personal opinions as some sort of clinical assessment. Contact @BellaMagnani if you want a rundown on the psych profile she ran on you.

This is an Op-ed article. The information contained in this post is for general information purposes only. While we endeavor to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information contained on the post for any purpose. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site.

The views or opinions represented in this blog do not represent those of people, institutions or organizations that the owner may or may not be associated with in professional or personal capacity, unless explicitly stated. Any views or opinions are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual.

The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information.  The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.

Leave a Reply