Twitter Locked My Account Again Because Of Assange Supporters, One Whistleblower Attorney, and a Cow

Right. So once again Twitter has locked my account unless I delete three tweets that the platform has designated as targeted harassment and abuse. None of my tweets are targeted abuse and it’s terrifying that someone reported me for pointing out that people like Jesselyn Radack, Ray Johansen, and Beth Bogaerts tried to dox me while I was writing a series on the government’s involvement with drug trafficking.

This isn’t some made up fairy tale. It happened and apparently certain actors want that fact buried.

No real activist or whistleblower attorney who believes in the cause would ever get off on trying to dox a journalist exposing this kind of story and it goes to show you how little they actually care about safety within the community. But we already knew this.

However, Jesselyn Radack and her friends surely wouldn’t censor speech simply because I called them a “piece of shit,” after they tried to dox me following the publication of articles about the U.S. government and drug trafficking (and the rise of the alt-right in the Assange community), right? I mean, these are the same people who cry all the time about Steve Biss censoring speech. Radack even has a GoFundMe, yes?

Meanwhile, Twitter doesn’t care that people like @LizActivate have been reported hundreds, if not thousands of times for her/his targeted harassment against a myriad of unrelated people, such as stating that I’m part of a “CIA rape team.” And yes, she really said that and Twitter finds this perfectly acceptable.

Nor did Twitter care that Ray Johansen posted over 50 targeted tweets blackmailing and threatening me in September 2020. This included him publicly targeting an allegedly abused child he thought was mine in the hopes that I would stop publishing and retract truthful statements to prevent said child from being humiliated and pushed into suicide by their peers.

Twitter also doesn’t care that “Kaidinn” has posted thousands of defamatory, targeted tweets which have included public instructions that people should track me down in real life and teach me a lesson using a dox that Johansen and Beth Bogaerts claimed was me.

We should also forget that Radack’s associate, Beth Bogaerts, literally perjured herself in court to frame me for things I absolutely did not do and I have been harassed and targeted ever since because of her actions. But god forbid you mention any of this on Twitter when you’re dealing with these actors.

So just so we’re clear: Yes, you can target, harass, defame, and even threaten people on Twitter but you can’t talk about how you’ve been targeted, harassed, defamed, and threatened because that would be targeted harassment.

Here are the other two tweets that were reported and I’m not terribly surprised one of them involves The “Muh Parody Account, GoFundMe, and Free Speech” Cow.

The last time someone reported one of my tweets, I was talking about reporting Kaidinn for telling people to hunt me down in real life and the Twitter thread involved The Cow. Shortly thereafter, Neal Rauhauser showed up in my DMs upset that I dared to mention Kaidinn, Radack, and The Cow in a bad light. He then threatened to file reports about me to the U.S. government about how I’m running foreign ops or some insane nonsense like that.

Liked it? Take a second to support Jimmysllama on Patreon!
Post Disclaimer

Disclaimer: Ten thousand more pages of disclaimers to follow.

If you were mentioned in this article because your associate(s) did or said something stupid/dishonest, that’s not a suggestion that you did or said something stupid/dishonest or that you took part in it. Of course, some may conclude on their own that you associate with stupid/dishonest individuals but that’s called having the right to an opinion. If I’ve questioned something that doesn’t make sense to me, that’s not me spinning the confusing material you’ve put out. That’s me trying to make sense out of something that doesn’t make sense. And if I’ve noted that you failed to back up your allegations that means I either missed where you posted it or you failed to back your shiz up.

If I haven’t specifically stated that I believe (my opinion) someone is associated with someone else or an event, then it means just that. I haven’t reported an association nor is there any inference of association on my part. For example, just because someone is mentioned in this article, it doesn’t mean that they’re involved or associated with everyone and everything else mentioned. If I believe that there’s an association between people and/or events, I’ll specifically report it.

If anyone mentioned in this article wants to claim that I have associated them with someone else or an event because I didn’t disclose every single person and event in the world that they are NOT associated with, that’s called gaslighting an audience and it’s absurd hogwash i.e. “They mentioned that I liked bananas but they didn’t disclose that I don’t like apples. Why are they trying to associate me with apples???” Or something similar to this lovely gem, “I did NOT give Trish the thumb drive!” in order to make their lazy audience believe that it was reported they gave Trish the thumb drive when, in fact, that was never reported, let alone inferred.

That’s some of the BS I’m talking about so try not to act like a psychiatric patient, intelligence agent, or paid cyber mercenary by doing these things. If you would like to share your story, viewpoint, or any evidence that pertains to this article, or feel strongly that something needs to be clarified or corrected (again, that actually pertains to the article), you can reach me at with any questions or concerns.

I cannot confirm and am not confirming the legitimacy of any messages or emails in this article. Please see a doctor if sensitivity continues. If anyone asks, feel free to tell them that I work for Schoenberger, Fitzgibbon, Steven Biss, the CIA, or really just about any intelligence agency because your idiocy, ongoing defamation, and failure as a human is truly a sight to behold for the rest of us.

If I described you as a fruit basket or even a mental patient it's because that is my opinion of you, it's not a diagnosis. I'm not a psychiatrist nor should anyone take my personal opinions as some sort of clinical assessment. Contact @BellaMagnani if you want a rundown on the psych profile she ran on you.

This is an Op-ed article. The information contained in this post is for general information purposes only. While we endeavor to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information contained on the post for any purpose. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site.

The views or opinions represented in this blog do not represent those of people, institutions or organizations that the owner may or may not be associated with in professional or personal capacity, unless explicitly stated. Any views or opinions are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual.

The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information.  The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.

Leave a Reply