The Life and Online Times of an Internet Troll

Let’s take a brief look at the life and online times of one of the grossest trolls on the internet named Elizabeth Mueller aka @LizActivate(d). Starting on August 27th, Liz Mueller did not stop tweeting out defamatory statements and targeted harassment (mostly against me) until 5:00 a.m. She started back up around 11:00 a.m. the next day, giving herself about a 6-hour night’s sleep or perhaps a shift at a part-time job.

She took a 4-hour break during the mid-morning/early afternoon and came back on Twitter around 6:30 p.m. Then she tweeted until 1:30 a.m., taking a 3-hour break to rest her typing fingers before returning as the keyboard warrior she believes she is at 4:00 a.m. However, she petered out after an hour and half.

On August 27th, Mueller posted approximately 88 tweets and based on the time she was on Twitter, it equates to approximately 22 tweets an hour. However, a day or two later, she only posted around 24 tweets, well below her recent average. What I was interested in is whether or not Mueller’s account is a group account because although it feels like she tweets 24/7, she actually doesn’t. The following is her general account activity and please note that the times have been rounded (generally speaking) to the top or bottom of the hour.

Friday, August 13
Tweets: 12:40 am – 6:45 am
Break: 6:45 am – 1:00 pm (6.45 hours)
Tweets: 1:00 pm – 4:00 pm
Break: 4:00 pm – 1:00 am (9 hours)
Tweets: 1:00 am – 3:45 am
Break: 3:45 am – 1:30 pm (9.45 hours)

Saturday, August 14
On Saturday, Liz didn’t start tweeting until 1:30 pm. but then she a took 3-hour break shortly after getting on online.

Tweets: 4:00 pm – 5:45 pm
Break: 5:45 pm – 12:30 am (6.45 hours)
Tweets: 12:30 am – 6:00 am
Break: 6:00 am -8:45 am (2.45 hours)

Sunday, August 15
On Sunday morning, Liz only tweeted from the time she got online at 8:45 am until 11:00 am. Then she took a 15-hour break.

Tweets: 8:45 am – 11:00 am
Break: 11:00 am – 2:30 am (15.5 hours)
Tweets: 2:30 am – 4:30 am
Break: 4:30 am – 7:00 am (2.45 hours)

Monday, August 16
Tweets: 7:00 am – 10:00 am
Break: 10:00 am – 2:30 pm (4.5 hours)
Tweets: 2:30 pm – 9:00 pm
Break: 9:00 pm – 6:45 am (9.45 hours)

Tuesday, August 17
Tweets: 6:45 am – 10:00 am
Break: 10:00 am – 8:00 pm (10 hours)
Tweets: 8:11 pm – 8:15 pm
Break: 8:15 – 6:30 am (10.45 hours)

Wednesday, August 18
Tweets: 6:30 am – 10:00 pm
Break: 10:00 pm – 2 am (4.5 hours)
Tweets: 2:00 am – 4:00 am
Break: 4:00 am – 8:30 am (4.5 hours)

Thursday, August 19
Tweets: 8:30 am – 1:00 pm
Break: 1:00 pm – 10:00 pm (8.45)
Tweets: 10:00 pm – 10:15 pm
Break: 10:15 pm – 4:30 am (6 hours)

Broken down even more, here are the approximate BREAK TIMES Miss activated took during the week I just covered. These are the times she was NOT on twitter:

Friday, August 13:
Break: 6:45 am – 1:00 pm (6.45 hours)
Break: 4:00 pm – 1:00 am (9 hours)
Break: 3:45 am – 1:30 pm (9.45 hours)

Saturday, August 14
Break: 5:45 pm – 12:30 am (6.45 hours)
Break: 6:00 am -8:45 am (2.45 hours)

Sunday, August 15
Break: 11:00 am – 2:30 am (15.5 hours)
Break: 4:30 am – 7:00 am (2.45 hours)

Monday, August 16
Break: 10:00 am – 2:30 pm (4.5 hours)
Break: 9:00 pm – 6:45 am (9.45 hours)

Tuesday, August 17
Break: 10:00 am – 8:00 pm (10 hours)
Break: 8:15 pm – 6:30 am (10.45 hours)

Wednesday, August 18
Break: 10:00 pm – 2 am (4.5 hours)
Break: 4:00 am – 8:30 am (4.5 hours)

Thursday, August 19
Break: 1:00 pm – 10:00 pm (8.45)
Break: 10:15 pm – 4:30 am (6 hours)

Now let’s look at the next week. Again, just the breaks she took:

Friday, August 20 
7:00 am-9:15 am (2 hours) 
8:00 p.m. – 9:45 a.m. (13.45 hours)

Saturday, August 21
1:30 p.m. – 9:30 p.m. (8 hours)
9:30 p.m. – 7:30 a.m. (10 hours)

Sunday, August 22
2:00 p.m. – 10:00 p.m. (8 hours)
10:30 p.m. – 12:30 a.m. (2 hours)
1:15 a.m. –   1:54 p.m. (13 hours)

Monday, August 23
2:00 pm – 11:00 p.m. (9 hours)
11:30 p.m. – 9:00 a.m. (9.5 hours)

Tuesday, August 24
12:00 pm – 10:00 p.m. (10 hours)
4:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. (7 hours)

Wednesday, August 25
11:30 a.m. – 8:30 p.m. (9 hours)
2:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m. (8 hours)

Thursday, August 26
1:00 a.m. – 6:00 a.m. (5 hours with one tweet posted 3:45 hours into this break)

There are very similar break times during the day for these two weeks, 10 out of 14 days to be exact, where she gets OFF of Twitter for approximately 6-10 hours between 10:00 am – 2:00 pm. Even what we would consider bedtime starts between 8:00 pm – 11:30 pm for 9 out of the 14 days. That’s not to say this chick doesn’t have some wacky hours. She does.

But based on this two-week schedule, one could easily surmise that Miss Activate(d) is very much employed despite her recent comments that she is not. I can only imagine what her employer would think if they knew what she was doing and how it would reflect on their business.

However, below is how her break schedule looked in the last four days.

Friday, August 27
7:00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m. (4.5 hours)
(she tweeted from 11:30 am – 11:30 pm)
break: 11:30pm-130am (2hours)
break 4am-1130am (7.5 hours)

Saturday, August 28
2:00 p.m. – 6:30 p.m. (4 hours)                   
1:30 a.m. – 4:00 a.m. (2.5 hours)
5:30 a.m. – 12:45 p.m (7 hours)

Sunday, August 29
7:20 p.m. – 9:00 p.m. (4 hours)
4:00am – 10:30 am (6.5 hours)

Monday, August 30
12:00 pm -5:00 (5 hours)
5:00 am – 2:30pm (9.5 hours)

Notice on Friday she tweeted for twelve hours straight without any significant breaks? On Saturday, Sunday, and Monday, her afternoon break is around the same time as the previous weeks meaning we don’t see her tweeting after approximately 12:00 – 2:00 pm but the breaks are shorter. They’re no longer 6-10 hours, they’re around 2 – 5 hours. Is she leaving work early or does she work the late shift and the day breaks are when she actually sleeps? Is she tweeting from work?

Regardless of the changes, I absolutely believe this woman is employed somewhere.

However, if I’m wrong, what exactly is this woman doing with all of that free time? Sponging off the system while she sits on Twitter trying to ruin peoples’ lives and actually get some of them killed? Liz Activated has actually demanded to know where my income and others’ come from but if anyone should answer that question, it’s this batshit lady running targeted defamation and harassment ops that are clearly being protected by Twitter.

When it comes to this being a group account, I’m not saying it isn’t especially with the last few days’ activity where someone could have picked up slack for her when she went to work. However, shocking as it may sound, it’s possible for this nut job to be doing it all on her own.

(Feel free to reach out to me with any errors. This was a shiz ton of numbers to keep track of…oof)

Liked it? Take a second to support Jimmysllama on Patreon!
Post Disclaimer

Disclaimer: Ten thousand more pages of disclaimers to follow.

If you were mentioned in this article because your associate(s) did or said something stupid/dishonest, that’s not a suggestion that you did or said something stupid/dishonest or that you took part in it. Of course, some may conclude on their own that you associate with stupid/dishonest individuals but that’s called having the right to an opinion. If I’ve questioned something that doesn’t make sense to me, that’s not me spinning the confusing material you’ve put out. That’s me trying to make sense out of something that doesn’t make sense. And if I’ve noted that you failed to back up your allegations that means I either missed where you posted it or you failed to back your shiz up.

If I haven’t specifically stated that I believe (my opinion) someone is associated with someone else or an event, then it means just that. I haven’t reported an association nor is there any inference of association on my part. For example, just because someone is mentioned in this article, it doesn’t mean that they’re involved or associated with everyone and everything else mentioned. If I believe that there’s an association between people and/or events, I’ll specifically report it.

If anyone mentioned in this article wants to claim that I have associated them with someone else or an event because I didn’t disclose every single person and event in the world that they are NOT associated with, that’s called gaslighting an audience and it’s absurd hogwash i.e. “They mentioned that I liked bananas but they didn’t disclose that I don’t like apples. Why are they trying to associate me with apples???” Or something similar to this lovely gem, “I did NOT give Trish the thumb drive!” in order to make their lazy audience believe that it was reported they gave Trish the thumb drive when, in fact, that was never reported, let alone inferred.

That’s some of the BS I’m talking about so try not to act like a psychiatric patient, intelligence agent, or paid cyber mercenary by doing these things. If you would like to share your story, viewpoint, or any evidence that pertains to this article, or feel strongly that something needs to be clarified or corrected (again, that actually pertains to the article), you can reach me at jimmysllama@protonmail.com with any questions or concerns.

I cannot confirm and am not confirming the legitimacy of any messages or emails in this article. Please see a doctor if sensitivity continues. If anyone asks, feel free to tell them that I work for Schoenberger, Fitzgibbon, Steven Biss, the CIA, or really just about any intelligence agency because your idiocy, ongoing defamation, and failure as a human is truly a sight to behold for the rest of us.

This is an Op-ed article. The information contained in this post is for general information purposes only. While we endeavor to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information contained on the post for any purpose. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site.

The views or opinions represented in this blog do not represent those of people, institutions or organizations that the owner may or may not be associated with in professional or personal capacity, unless explicitly stated. Any views or opinions are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual.

The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information.  The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.

Leave a Reply