The Rabbit Files 8.3: Was Guccifer 2 Compromised?

I realize that The Rabbit Files is becoming a pretty convoluted story so I’m going to update each series summary e.g. The Rabbit Files 8.0-8.5, after they’re done. That goes for the timeline, as well. I’m also going to add a summary of the previous series files in my introductions from here on out and I probably should have been doing that from the beginning but I’ve never been accused of being a planner. Additionally, if you notice any mistakes in The Rabbit Files, especially with the timeline, feel free to reach out to me so I can correct them.

In its entirety, The Rabbit Files 8.0 series generally focuses on Guccifer 2 and the Seth Rich conspiracy theory, and in the Rabbit Files 8.0, specifically, it focuses on how Julian Assange and WikiLeaks played a role in encouraging the conspiracy by offering a reward for any information leading to the arrest of Seth Rich’s killer(s) and posting multiple tweets about the situation. For example, on August 11, 2016, they tweeted about Brad Bauman who they described as a spokesperson for the Rich family and a “professional Democrat crisis PR consultant” from the Pastorum Group.

I noted that the Pastorum Group absorbed clients from a former PR firm that repped for Julian Assange called Fitzgibbon Media which was shuttered less than a year prior over sexual harassment and assault allegations. The most serious of those allegations were later filed by attorney, Jesselyn Radack, whose non-profit “whistleblower” organization was funded by George Soros at the time and may still be. A year later, The U.S. Department of Justice closed their investigation into Radack’s allegations and the owner of the firm, Trevor Fitzgibbon, was never charged.

Radack deposition in Fitzgibbon v. Radack, September 7, 2018

I’ll address this again later in The Rabbit Files but since it recently came to my attention and it’s fairly interesting, I’ll also note it here: After the demise of Fitzgibbon Media, not only did DNC “professional” crisis PR guy, Brad Bauman, absorb clients from the firm, some of the firm’s former staffers, so-called progressives, took to social media to complain about how the firm had represented Assange (and Venezuela), Fitzgibbon was “scum” for making them do so, and it was so bad that these things kept coming up in subsequent interviews.

One former staffer sarcastically remarked, “good thing our old firm worked with [Assange],” and that comment along with other comments from former staffers in the Facebook thread below (left) completely negates Beth Bogaerts’ (@HumanOfMind) ongoing defamation/whisper campaign that Fitzgibbon, meh, really didn’t do any work for Assange. At the time that Fitzgibbon Media was shuttered it was one of the few, if not the only PR firm in the United States, representing the WikiLeaks founder and more and more evidence is mounting that Bogaerts is just a bitter, revengeful liar.

The Rabbit Files 8.0 also discussed how there’s been exactly ZERO evidence produced that proves Seth Rich leaked the DNC files to WikiLeaks despite what operatives, propagandists, larpers, Ed Butowsky, or anyone else has lead you to believe.

The Rabbit Files 8.1 reported that in March 2017, Twitter accounts like Anonymous Scandinavia and @BellaMagnani heavily promoted an erroneous story that accused DNC employee, Warren Flood, of being the man behind the Guccifer 2 persona (also see The Rabbit Files 5.0: A Flood Approaches…). This debunked conspiracy theory just so happened to play right into the hands of Cicada 3301’s 2017 puzzle “A Fludd Approaches…,” and it may have influenced former Playboy model, Robbin Young, to release in early April 2017, secret Twitter DMs she shared with Guccifer 2 eight months prior.

Young’s Twitter DMs revealed that Guccifer 2 told her that Seth Rich was their source, inexplicably negating their previous narrative that they were a “lone wolf hacker.” Also noted in the article was Jared and Lee Beck’s lawsuit that they filed against the DNC using some of Guccifer 2’s leaked documents as evidence that the DNC deliberately robbed Bernie Sanders of the nomination. Guccifer 2 took a particular interest in the lawsuit and was in early communications with journalist/activist/bootlicker Cassandra Fairbanks about it.

Other subjects of interest that Guccifer 2 brought up in their DMs like David Seaman, a notorious figure in the Pizzage-Pedogate scene, were reported int the The Rabbit Files 8.2. In 2017, Seaman got tied up with former CIA spook and conspiracy nutter, Robert David Steele, and eventually attorney Steve Biss after RDS introduced him to the notorious lawfare attorney. 

Other individuals that worked with RDS included Thomas Schoenberger and Beth Bogaerts who did research for one of his lawsuits and then Bogaerts introduced Trevor Fitzgibbon to Steve Biss; Fitzgibbon, who worked on RDS’ Unrig campaign; and (by association) Suzie Dawson’s #Unity4J campaign via Cynthia McKinney who was RDS’ partner on the Unrig campaign.

Also noted was the fact that attorney Steve Biss was tied to Pedogate not only through his former client Dave Seaman, but Timothy Holmseth, a Qanon nutter who pals around with yet another Qanon nutter named Field McConnell a.k.a. “Abel Danger.” Bogaerts and attorney Jesselyn Radack’s (@JesselynRadack) associate, Lestat a.k.a. @ATafoyovsky, was gifted McConnell’s Youtube channel in 2019, which he and his associates subsequently used Gamergate-style to extrajudicially target people he determined to be “cyber criminals,” as well as their alleged associates. I also reported that Lestat, a down and out wanker who lives in Mexico and spends every waking hour on Twitter accusing everyone and their mother of being linked to Qanon, never mentions McConnell in his Qanon research because reasons.

As for The Rabbit Files 8.3-8.4, we’re going to examine whether or not Guccifer 2’s Twitter account was compromised in mid-August 2016, if the DMs between Guccifer 2 and Robbin Young were manufactured, the third Guccifer 2, and the now-retracted Fox News story about Seth Rich. Grab a coffee…


Was Guccifer 2 Compromised?

In The Rabbit Files 8.1, we were reminded of Jared and Lee Beck’s class action suit that they filed against the DNC almost a month before WikiLeaks started publishing the DNC emails. As supporting evidence that the DNC deliberately plotted against Bernie Sanders, they used at least one document that Guccifer 2 released on June 15, 2016, the first day that the Romanian persona appeared online. Guccifer 2 then sought out Cassandra Fairbanks for updates about the lawsuit.

Seth Rich was killed twelve days later and on July 22nd [this previously said June 22nd, it was corrected on July 15, 2021], WikiLeaks started publishing the DNC emails which also exposed how the DNC deliberately worked against Sanders. On August 9th, Assange mentioned Rich for the first time during an interview and four days later, on August 13th, both the Guccifer 2 WordPress and Twitter account were shut down for approximately 24 hours.

I’m not suggesting that these events are related but I have mentioned the suspension of Guccifer 2’s accounts previously because for whatever weird, completely unscientific and unsupported reason, I believe this was significant and might indicate that the accounts were compromised during this time period.

Take for instance the fact that Guccifer 2 didn’t start DM’ing with Roger Stone until the day the Twitter account was reinstated. This was also the same day that Steven Bannon was hired by the Trump campaign although it wouldn’t be made public until August 17th. Guccifer 2 also didn’t respond to Lee Stranahan’s DMs until after the suspension and it wasn’t until August 15th, that they started communicating with former Playboy model, Robbin Young. When they mentioned Seth Rich’s murder to Cassandra Fairbanks, it wasn’t until August 18th.

In addition to first speaking with Young on August 15th, Guccifer 2 also sent a congressional candidate in Florida documents on his opponent and published DCCC documents pertaining to a Florida race via the G2 WordPress account.

The very next day, on August 16th, the 2016 The Future of Cyber Security Europe announced that Guccifer 2 would be appearing at their September 13th conference but that never happened. Instead, a PowerPoint presentation allegedly submitted by G2 was presented by one of the conference’s organizers. The presentation focused on “hacks” that had “exploited flaws in NGP-VAN, the voter analysis systems used by Democrats” which doesn’t seem terribly surprising when we start to notice how many Bernie Sanders supporters are involved with this endless shit show. More from The Rabbit Files 1.0: Who Spoofed the Seth Rich Files:

For anyone that’s not familiar with NGP VAN, it’s a tech company that provides political campaigns access to voter files, meaning it’s essentially a central database of everything that a campaign has learned about voters which can include age, gender, address, phone number, race, etc. The DNC stores all of this information in a central database maintained by NGP VAN and obviously each campaign’s data is kept separate from the other. In 2005, former Vermont Governor Howard Dean took over the DNC and he started the central voter file system, but it was Stu Trevelyan who actually built NGP VAN.” 

In December 2015, Bernie Sanders staffers including IT worker, Josh Uretsky, were able to breach the DNC’s system (think of it like the NGP VAN “wall” between the Sanders campaign and the Clinton campaign was penetrated—I think, but no quotes, I’m not a tech person) and according to some reports, at least one summary data table was exported although an independent investigation couldn’t locate the file. Uretsky was fired over the incident despite claims that the Sanders’ campaign accessed the data to prove to the DNC that its system was still exposing campaign data after previous warnings.” 

Included in the PowerPoint that was alleged to have come from Guccifer 2 was a link and password to some files called the “.7z files” and no, they didn’t come from the NGP VAN breach although it appears that someone very much wanted you to think so. The .7z files were also the same ‘not-even-chickenfeed” files that White Rabbit pawned off to independent journalist, Trish Negron, almost nine months later under the guise they were the “Seth Rich files.”

The files, in fact, were so irrelevant that as Stephen McIntyre pointed out, no state actor or sanctioned hacker would be interested in pilfering them. Although McIntyre described the files in a much more eloquent “not-even-chickenfeed” kind of way, imma go the more crass route and say that whoever leaked the .7z files to the conference were fucking around for the sake of fucking around.

A month later, Adam Carter from G-2.space also suggested that Guccifer 2 may have been compromised after they released more underwhelming documents they claimed were from the Clinton Foundation. They weren’t, but some of the .7z documents were found in the “Clinton Foundation files” (also known as the cf.7z files), and some of the cf.7z files were found in Guccifer 2’s first release on June 15th, indicating that all of these files may have came from the same batch.

The cf.7z files were also the same files that former #Unity4J member and current social media director for SoMee.Social, Aaron Kesel (@Cens0redAK, @An0nAKn0wledge), repeatedly stated over the course of the last four years were sent to him from Guccifer 2. Kesel is an associate of “hacktividiot” Ray Johansen who also claimed that he was “chosen” to receive Guccifer 2 documents via a whistleblower platform he was allegedly part of called BerlinLeaks.org. A laundry list of Kesel’s claims can be find HERE.

As if things can’t get any more stupid, Johansen is the same guy who either has access to or is associated with the Anonymous Scandinavia Twitter account (Note: AnonScan recently denied he has access to their account, see below under “Annoyingly Long Updates”), an account that just so happened to be one of the (anonymous) speakers in both 2018 and 2019 at the same cyber conference that released the PowerPoint presentation containing the .7z files.

And both Anonymous Scandinavia and Ray Johansen are associates with Beth Bogaerts, the close associate of White Rabbit who deliberately pawned off the .7z files to Trish Negron in early June 2017, under the guise they were the “Seth Rich Files.”

In fact, both White Rabbit and Bogaerts were well aware of where the .7z files came from when White Rabbit lied to Trish Negron and Bogaerts alone was only one of 17 people who retweeted PSBE Futures Group’s September 8, 2016 tweet promoting the cyber event where Guccifer 2 never showed up and the PowerPoint, which included the link and password to the .7z files, was presented in their place. To make matters even more suss, as far as I am aware no conference organizer has been willing to confirm that the PowerPoint came from Guccifer 2.

So just to be clear, White Rabbit and Bogaerts knew all about the .7z files the day they were released on September 13, 2016. Seven months later, in early April 2017, Robbin Young decided to release her old DMs with Guccifer 2 in which the “Romanian hacker” said that Seth Rich was their source. That is, if the DMs weren’t manufactured. According to Trish Negron, a month after that, Bogaerts, started peddling the .7z files to her and others as possibly being the “Seth Rich files.” Then, on or around June 1, 2017, White Rabbit gave Negron a thumb drive containing the files, deliberately portraying them as “Seth Rich files,” while they all acted as if these were some top secret files that Mossad might kill them over.

Keep in mind that at the time the White Rabbit thumb drive debacle went down, Bogaerts had already been working with Ray Johansen’s associate “Weda” since at least January 2017, and by April 2017, when Robbin Young released her DMs, she was chumming around with a hacking group called AnonIntelGroup that included Johansen, Aaron Kesel, Kitty Hundal, and possibly an online troll called “Kaidinn.” During that same time period, AnonIntelGroup had started an anti-Assange campaign essentially accusing him of working with Trump and the Russians.

The Guccifer 2/Robbin Young DMs

If we examine Robbin Young’s DMs with Guccifer 2, she was clearly pro-Trump, vehemently anti-Hillary, and, interestingly enough, she repeatedly brought up her distress over Clinton and Benghazi. Taking into account the entirety of what The Rabbit Files has covered regarding the Guccifer/Young DMs, a narrative starts to take shape:

  • Assange might be working with the Russians (not with the DNC emails) but he’s still a hero
  • Anti-Hillary
  • Pro-Trump
  • Pro-Seth Rich conspiracy
  • Pro-Hillary/Benghazi conspiracy
  • Pro-Cassandra Fairbanks (she spoke with Guccifer 2 about the pro-Bernie lawsuit filed by the Becks; later promoted the Pizzagate and Seth Rich conspiracies; published stories about Seth Rich and the Sy Hersh interview via Matt Couch’s online media outlet; and conducted a glowing interview with Ed Butowsky about Seth Rich)
  • Pro-David Seaman (Pizzagate/Pedogate)

I hate to break it to everyone but 99% of this sounds like right-wing/alt-right bait. I mean, lemme get this straight: Russia was in bed with Trump, the alt-right, and Julian Assange so they deliberately planted Russian fingerprints in Guccifer 2’s first five documents and then they decided to negate their entire “lone wolf hacker” story by telling Robbin Young that Seth Rich was their source (after Julian Assange first acknowledged him). Then they had Young release these DMs five months after the election, the contents of which paints a right-wing, pro-Trump, pro-Assange narrative…in order to accomplish what exactly? Snitch on themselves because U.S. sanctions are so fun to deal with?

In no way do I believe that the Guccifer 2 operation was controlled by the Russians or the CIA or Crowdstrike or the DNC. I mean, could the CIA have been involved? Sure, and it certainly wouldn’t be the first time that they worked with, say, hackers from Anonymous. For example, Anonymous hackers were working directly with U.S. intelligence agencies during #OpISIS, an Anonymous operation that started in 2015, and continued well into the late election season of 2016. In previous articles, I’ve noted how I’ve always believed that #OpISIS was simply an extension of the Sabu operation.

I mean, Ray Johansen’s buddy, Aaron Kesel, said that he worked with the CIA until it was exposed in the The Gatekeeper Files (here and here) and then he changed his story. And here’s Anonymous Scandinavia actually trying to justify this working arrangement via #GhostSec. “Ohai, I just happen to be a hacker feeding the U.S. government intelligence off the heels of the Sabu debacle but nothing to see here.” Please. Can you imagine the defamation campaigns these people would wage today against the rest of us if we were hackers feeding intel to the same intelligence agencies that were setting up and then putting away our friends e.g. Jeremy Hammond?

The bottom line is that it’s been completely overlooked and/or buried that Mueller told us virtually nothing about Guccifer 2’s WordPress nor did he ever prove that Guccifer 2 was involved in hacking. Spear-phishing maybe, but not hacking. Additionally, I’m not aware of him ever mentioning the following accounts or events that these hacktividiots, “White Rabbit,” and associates were involved in: The Alice Donovan Twitter account (she was the alleged Russian persona who worked for WeAreChange.org, the same media outlet where Cassandra Fairbanks and Johansen’s associate, Aaron Kesel, were working at the time); the cyber conference and the .7z files; the “Clinton Foundation files” (cf.7z files) allegedly sent to Aaron Kesel; or Robbin Young’s DMs with Guccifer 2.

Nor am I aware of these hacktividiots ever being questioned by the Mueller investigation after claiming they received documents from Guccifer 2. I’ll say it again, people fucking around for the sake of fucking around and PSYOPS.

It’s also been completely ignored how strange it is that the Guccifer 2 Twitter account made a complete about face on August 25th, by telling Robbin Young that Seth Rich was their source, negating the entire persona they had built for themselves as a “lone wolf hacker.” And why share this with Robbin Young of all people? And why did Young wait eight months before disclosing this information? Maybe Anonymous Scandinavia knows why since they’ve been buddies with Young since 2017:

I gotta admit, I find it kinda weird that three women who posed for Playboy at one time or another have all played a very specific role in the WikiLeaks story and Anonymous Scandinavia has been obsessed with all three: Robbin Young, Pamela Anderson, and Jesselyn Radack. Also note in that first screenshot above that Anonymous Scandinavia signs the tweet with “M,” the same initial the original administrator always used and if you scroll to the bottom of this article under “Annoyingly Long Updates,” you’ll see how this account can’t even keep their own stories straight.

So was the Guccifer 2 account compromised in mid-August and if so, were the hijackers looking to discredit Guccifer 2 with the Robbin Young DMs, the .7z files, and the “Clinton Foundation files,” or was this a right-wing attempt to revive the Seth Rich conspiracy during the same time period that WikiLeaks started publishing Vault 7 and the Ed Butowsky/Rod Wheeler investigation was heating up—a conspiracy that only served two people: Donald Trump and Julian Assange? Don’t forget that WikiLeaks was in bed with alt-right Trump insiders like Cassandra Fairbanks during the election and, frankly, probably still is. If the G2 account(s) were NOT compromised, why did the original operator(s) decide to unexpectedly change course? Or is it that they never changed course and Robbin Young’s DMs were manipulated?

THIS ENTIRE POST IS STRICTLY MY OPINION. PLEASE DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH AND COME TO YOUR CONCLUSIONS.

DisclaimerTen more pages of disclaimers to follow: If you were mentioned in this article because your associate(s) did or said something stupid/dishonest, that’s not a suggestion that you did or said something stupid/dishonest or that you took part in it. Of course, some may conclude on their own that you associate with stupid/dishonest individuals but that’s called having the right to an opinion. If I’ve questioned something that doesn’t make sense to me, that’s not me spinning the confusing material you’ve put out. That’s me trying to make sense out of something that doesn’t make sense. And if I’ve noted that you failed to back up your allegations that means I either missed where you posted it or you failed to back your shiz up.

If I haven’t specifically stated that I believe (my opinion) someone is associated with someone else or an event, then it means just that. I haven’t reported an association nor is there any inference of association on my part. For example, just because someone is mentioned in this article, it doesn’t mean that they’re involved or associated with everyone and everything else mentioned. If I believe that there’s an association between people and/or events, I’ll specifically report it. 

If anyone mentioned in this article wants to claim that I have associated them with someone else or an event because I didn’t disclose every single person and event in the world that they are NOT associated with, that’s called gaslighting an audience and it’s absurd hogwash i.e. “They mentioned that I liked bananas but they didn’t disclose that I don’t like apples. Why are they trying to associate me with apples???” Or something similar to this lovely gem, “I did NOT give Trish the thumb drive!” in order to make their lazy audience believe that it was reported they gave Trish the thumb drive when, in fact, that was never reported, let alone inferred.

That’s some of the BS I’m talking about so try not to act like a psychiatric patient, intelligence agent, or paid cyber mercenary by doing these things. If you would like to share your story, viewpoint, or any evidence that pertains to this article, or feel strongly that something needs to be clarified or corrected (again, that actually pertains to the article), you can reach me at jimmysllama@protonmail.com with any questions or concerns.

I cannot confirm and am not confirming the legitimacy of any messages or emails in this article. Please see a doctor if sensitivity continues. If anyone asks, feel free to tell them that I work for Schoenberger, Fitzgibbon, Steven Biss, the CIA, or really just about any intelligence agency because your idiocy, ongoing defamation, and failure as a human is truly a sight to behold for the rest of us.

Annoyingly Long Updates:

I have noted throughout The Rabbit Files that I personally believe former AnonIntelGroup member and hacktivist, Ray Johansen, has access to and/or is a close associate of both the old @AnonScan account as well as the new one, @AnonScandinavia. Over the course of the last three years, neither of these accounts have ever rebuked things like fascist elements being welcomed into the Assange support community but they recently took the time to publicly chastise me over my belief about Johansen’s access (while failing to address the association part) because apparently my opinions are more important to the emotional “Anonymous Scandinavia” than, say, fighting fascism.

And even though @AnonScandinavia publicly denied that Johansen has access to their account, which may indeed be true, the account is also known for protecting abusive liars, promoting malicious actors who carry out defamation campaigns and try to dox activists, and associating with Beth Bogaerts (@HumanOfMind) who went so insanely far to discredit me that she actually perjured herself in court multiple times by bizarrely and falsely accusing me of being paid/hired by her former business partner so, no, I don’t believe them. Like, on any level. As for my audience, I’ll leave it up to them to make their own decision. 

Of course, @AnonScandinavia’s recent denials in no way negate the fact that the account privately vouched for Johansen in the past in order to boost Johansen’s trustworthiness factor which is exactly zero despite his endless twaddle about “trust” and “loyalty.” That is, if the person(s) behind the account now is the same one(s) who previously vouched for Johansen which they themselves claim they’re not. 

Due to incredibly poor opsec, whoever was running the old @AnonScan account in September 2020, claimed that someone (?) was able to contact the family of the @AnonScan administrator and gain the passwords to Anonymous Scandinavia’s Youtube and email accounts. Then they claimed they were still working on gaining control of the Twitter account.

This was after guys like Johansen spread endless private rumors that the (original?) administrator of the @AnonScan account was highly depressed hence the reason there had been no activity on the account for months last year. I’ve also heard rumors that some people were told the administrator killed himself. 

Like other things that have disappeared after they were exposed in The Rabbit Files, Anonymous Scandinavia rewrote the video title and deleted the video description on a September 7, 2020 video they posted that explained this ridiculous story and revealed just how bad the account’s opsec was. 

So aside from @AnonScan being an opsec dumpster fire, according to the above statement the lack of activity on the account last year was not due to the administrator’s depression but rather vicious attacks on their servers and devices. And yes, Anonymous Scandinavia, their servers, and their devices have been so heavily targeted by the deep shadows of lurking intelligence agencies (as they have claimed repeatedly over the years) that the original administrator, an alleged member of Anonymous, no less, decided it was a great idea to give out enough personal information to unnamed actors that enabled these unnamed actors to track down and contact his family in order to obtain the passwords to all of @AnonScan’s accounts.

These people are seriously running a three-ring circus on a Suzie Dawson merry-go-round.

Then, earlier this year the @AnonScan account was shut down (deleting all evidence of what they’ve posted since 2016) and a new one popped up a month later as @AnonScandinavia, claiming that they are the same as the old @AnonScan account. But do they mean the old @AnonScan account where unnamed actor(s) took control of it after apparently obtaining the password from the administrator’s family or do they mean the old old account and they’re the same person who was heavily depressed and may or may not have committed suicide? 

As if this story can’t get anymore ridiculous, the very first video that @AnonScandinavia posted upon their return with the new account was a 50-some-year old guy (age not confirmed loool) wearing a mask and asking people to be his personal snitch by uploading documents from their personal devices to an insecure server this guy obviously runs. What he wanted was any and all information pertaining to anyone who had pretended to be Anonymous Scandinavia or associated with them, which, of course, no one is aware of anyone “pretending” to be Anonymous Scandinavia for over three years now, but okay, buddy. 

This grown ass man then ended the video by threatening unknown individuals they claim are harassing and defaming people they support which is pretty hilarious based on the trolls that account has promoted over the years, themselves included. I mean, let’s be serious, what kind of male “activist” and “hacktivist” makes this kind of video and then expects to be taken seriously? And 2017 called, they’re still waiting on that “troll list” AnonScan said they were going to release.

After dealing with the @AnonScan account for years, personally I just think that they like to post or say things that make them appear way more important than they really are and, admittedly, I used to believe every word. But, again, you should come to your conclusions. 

The funny thing about all of this is that the first (and maybe only) tweet that Julian Assange retweeted from the @AnonScan account back in early 2017, which led a lot of us to believe that Assange was working with the account, was a video that @AnonScan deliberately stole as their own from an Assange supporter who had created it. To this day, Anonymous Scandinavia has never given them credit and I should have known then what a complete and utter fraud this guy and his associates really are.

In other news, for those of you familiar with the Twitter user “Kaidinn,” apparently they recently claimed responsibility for the “@AnonFoxfire” account which was a part of the AnonIntelGroup with Ray Johansen. Although some people believe that Beth Bogaerts was behind the account due to the similarities in handles (@AnonFoxfire/@Foxfire2112) and her involvement with the hacktivist scene including working as an editor for one of Johansen’s associates, it turns out that one of the most pathetic smear artists on the internet who used to work with Johansen is now claiming the account as theirs. What an absolute embarrassment for the hacking group and its associates.

Liked it? Take a second to support Jimmysllama on Patreon!
Post Disclaimer

Disclaimer: Ten thousand more pages of disclaimers to follow.

If you were mentioned in this article because your associate(s) did or said something stupid/dishonest, that’s not a suggestion that you did or said something stupid/dishonest or that you took part in it. Of course, some may conclude on their own that you associate with stupid/dishonest individuals but that’s called having the right to an opinion. If I’ve questioned something that doesn’t make sense to me, that’s not me spinning the confusing material you’ve put out. That’s me trying to make sense out of something that doesn’t make sense. And if I’ve noted that you failed to back up your allegations that means I either missed where you posted it or you failed to back your shiz up.

If I haven’t specifically stated that I believe (my opinion) someone is associated with someone else or an event, then it means just that. I haven’t reported an association nor is there any inference of association on my part. For example, just because someone is mentioned in this article, it doesn’t mean that they’re involved or associated with everyone and everything else mentioned. If I believe that there’s an association between people and/or events, I’ll specifically report it.

If anyone mentioned in this article wants to claim that I have associated them with someone else or an event because I didn’t disclose every single person and event in the world that they are NOT associated with, that’s called gaslighting an audience and it’s absurd hogwash i.e. “They mentioned that I liked bananas but they didn’t disclose that I don’t like apples. Why are they trying to associate me with apples???” Or something similar to this lovely gem, “I did NOT give Trish the thumb drive!” in order to make their lazy audience believe that it was reported they gave Trish the thumb drive when, in fact, that was never reported, let alone inferred.

That’s some of the BS I’m talking about so try not to act like a psychiatric patient, intelligence agent, or paid cyber mercenary by doing these things. If you would like to share your story, viewpoint, or any evidence that pertains to this article, or feel strongly that something needs to be clarified or corrected (again, that actually pertains to the article), you can reach me at jimmysllama@protonmail.com with any questions or concerns.

I cannot confirm and am not confirming the legitimacy of any messages or emails in this article. Please see a doctor if sensitivity continues. If anyone asks, feel free to tell them that I work for Schoenberger, Fitzgibbon, Steven Biss, the CIA, or really just about any intelligence agency because your idiocy, ongoing defamation, and failure as a human is truly a sight to behold for the rest of us.

If I described you as a fruit basket or even a mental patient it's because that is my opinion of you, it's not a diagnosis. I'm not a psychiatrist nor should anyone take my personal opinions as some sort of clinical assessment. Contact @BellaMagnani if you want a rundown on the psych profile she ran on you.

This is an Op-ed article. The information contained in this post is for general information purposes only. While we endeavor to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information contained on the post for any purpose. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site.

The views or opinions represented in this blog do not represent those of people, institutions or organizations that the owner may or may not be associated with in professional or personal capacity, unless explicitly stated. Any views or opinions are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual.

The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information.  The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.

Leave a Reply