AFG Biosolutions, Kazakstan and Uranium?
In 2000, financier Jon Stout purchased a controlling interest in Hadron, Inc. and as noted earlier, he merged the company with Analex, taking Analex’s name and re-listing the company on the U.S. stock market. Four years later, Analex sold it’s subsidiary, Advanced Biosystems, to a “management-led buyout group” led by Alibek who helped co-found the subsidiary; former Analex director C.W. Gilluly; Alibek’s friend and former director of USAMRIID, Charles Bailey; and McCollum’s former top aide, Vaughn Forrest. The company was renamed AFG Biosolutions.
Less than a year after Alibek’s consortium purchased AFG Biosolutions, President Bill Clinton and Frank Giustra touched down in Kazakhstan after Giustra assembled a financial team back home prepared to finance those infamous uranium mining rights that eventually came back to haunt Hillary Clinton. Two prominent Kazakhs were behind the sale: Mukhtar Ablyazov, a well-known oppositional leader to President Nazarbayev’s regime and who became chairman of Kazakhstan’s BTA Bank just four months prior to the sale; and Mukhtar Dzhakishev, a scientist who headed up Kazakhstan’s state-run uranium and energy agency, KazAtomProm.
After setting up two corporate entities and two joint ventures, Dzhakishev transferred the uranium mining rights to the companies which were then sold to Giustra by Ablyazov. Ablyazov reportedly received $350 million for the deal. In an interview with The Globe and Mail, Giustra later denied that President Nazarbayev or Bill Clinton had anything to do with the sale adding that he had bought the shares of uranium from “private individuals.” Indeed. As I previously reported in April 2017:
“Didn’t the Kazakhstan government own the uranium that Giustra bought? Interestingly, in a 2005 article entitled, ‘The Third Term,’ written by Joe Conason, Conason wrote that after Bill Clinton had dinner with President Nazarbayev on September 6, 2005, he also had a 2:30 a.m. meeting with ‘Kazakh opposition leaders to hear their complaints about the authoritarian Nazarbayev’…If this story is true then perhaps Clinton indeed pulled some strings—but not with Nazarbayev. Rather, with Ablyazov and Dzhakishev.”
So in 2004, Alibek acquired AFG Biosolutions. In 2005, Giustra acquired uranium mining rights from two well-known Kazakhs. And in 2006, Alibek—a native Kazakh reportedly from a prominent family—created two new companies, Maxwell Biocorporation, and its subsidiary, Maxwell USA, LLC, located in Washington D.C.
No, Max-well Corporation, Ukraine and Uranium
After founding Maxwell Biocorporation, Alibek won approximately $28 million in federal grants and/or contracts for his projects with the help of his political friends from the Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare. Mark O’Connell, Saxton’s congressional chief of staff, introduced Alibek to former U.S. Congressman Jerry Lewis, who provided “annual earmarks of federal money for Alibek’s projects.” James Saxon, himself, approached the director of DARPA who, in turn, provided grant money for Alibek. Saxton also “guided Alibek” as he sought at least $10 million in research funds from the U.S. Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), a government agency that works in a myriad of countries, including the Ukraine via U.S. embassies.
According to Joanna Wintrol, the head of DTRA’s office in Kyiv, they’re focused on WMD threats and working with Ukrainian authorities. Her team has trained the National Police, Security Service of Ukraine and the State Border Guard Service, as well as engaged in “facilities renovations” and “provision of supplies.” They also fund “peaceful research and vaccine development by Ukrainian scientists.”
In 2008, Alibek opened a subsidiary in the Ukraine; a pharmaceutical factory named Max-Well Corporation, now known as Pharmex. Peter Leitner, president of Higgins Counterterrorism Research Center, was appointed president of the Ukrainian project. In July 2008, the U.S.-Ukraine Business Council (USUBC) reported that the facility was the “only US-owned pharmaceutical production facility in Ukraine” and the “largest single high-technology American investment in Ukraine to date.” Located in the Kyiv Oblast town of Boryspil, Max-Well included a scientific research center and was expected to manufacture “drug products” much like its parent company “where the substances for biopharmaceuticals are developed and produced.”
Rather than focusing on the expected—deadly bacteria and viruses like anthrax which are Alibek’s speciality—Max-Well’s mission was reportedly to increase the lifespan of Ukrainians and improve their quality of life with a focus on cancer and cardiovascular disease through “top quality medications.” However, in an interview with Gordon Thomas which the author shared in his book, “Inside British Intelligence: 100 Years of M15 and M16,” Alibek stated, “My research grants in U.S. government contracts now exceed $25 million. My facility in the Ukraine is working to produce antiviral drugs and antibiotics to save hundreds of millions, if not billions, of people from being killed by biological weapons which North Korea and Iran possess.”
The Ukrainian government wholly embraced the project and during Max-Well’s grand opening in April 2008, then-President Viktor Yushchenko congratulated them on “the largest center in the post-Soviet space…I am convinced that in the future you will continue to develop your activities in Ukraine.” Later that year, both Alibek and Peter Leitner attended an invitation-only presidential breakfast held in honor of Yushchenko and hosted in Washington D.C. During the event’s Q & A session, Alibek asked Yushchenko about licensing for foreign pharmaceutical companies within the Ukraine to which Yushchenko responded that Alibek should “work closely” with his staff to “resolve issues.” It was reported that the total expected investment costs for the facility were over $130 million.
Three years before the facility opened, Alibek gave an interview to Russian news outlet, Interfax, from his hometown of Almaty, Kazakhstan, shockingly stating that the “Russians had stopped ‘all work to develop biological weapons.’” The Los Angeles Times asked former USAMRIID director, Charles Bailey, if Alibek’s statement made him question what he had said previously about global biological threats. He quietly replied, “Definitely, it does.” But Alibek’s sudden change of heart about the Russians’ bioweapons program wasn’t the only sketchy thing that came to light. On July 28, 2008, a weekly magazine called BusinessUkraine reported that the funding for the construction of Max-Well was controlled by none other than Mukhtar Ablyazov, the very same Kazakh businessman and head of BTA Bank that co-sold the uranium to the Clintons’ close associate, Frank Giustra.
BTA Bank Theft and Money Laundering
In 2007, two years after Ablyazov and his partner, Mukhtar Dzhakishev, sold Frank Giustra the mining rights to uranium fields in Kazakhstan, Dzhakishev flew to the United States for a meeting with then-President Bill Clinton which was reportedly arranged by Giustra. Clinton initially denied that the meeting took place and it is unknown what the three men discussed.
Despite what appeared to be ties with the U.S. president on at least some level, nothing could apparently protect Ablyazov and Dzhakishev from President Nazarbayev’s regime. In February 2009, the Kazakhstan government nationalized BTA Bank and accused Ablyazov of embezzling billions from it. Then, in May, both men were charged with stealing uranium deposits stemming from the Giustra deal; Dzhakishev was arrested in Kazakhstan while Ablyazov had already fled the country.
In 2010, of all the people in the world, Tamerlan and Jahar Tsarnaev’s uncle, Ruslan Tsarni, submitted testimony to a London court on behalf of Ablyazov in one of the more bizarre plot twists to come out of the Boston bombings. This, of course, makes no sense unless Tsarni had insider knowledge and/or experience with working with Ablyazov, the Nazarbayev regime, or both. Tsarni does, in fact, have a fairly extensive and sketchy history in Kazakhstan and I suspect he was testifying on behalf of the U.S. government and/or an intelligence agency, and it never ceases to amaze me how this story failed to stir the media’s curiosity.
To add to this story, Ablyazov is accused of laundering millions of dollars he allegedly embezzled from BTA bank through Alibek and Leitner’s Max-Well center in the Ukraine. Although the relationship between Alibek and Ablyazov remains somewhat unclear, in 2019, McClatchy published an article about another BTA money-laundering case filed in the United States (Virginia). Former head of human resources for the Department of Energy, Jody Hudson, testified in the case in which BTA’s lawyers argued that “Hudson’s longtime girlfriend, Gaukhar Kussainova, received millions in funds stolen” by her brother who just so happens to be Mukhtar Ablyazov. Of particular interest is her ties with Alibek’s bio-companies:
“In 2006 Alibek became a businessman, creating a company called AFG Biosolutions for microbiological research. He then formed Maxwell Biocorporation, to manufacture cancer medicines for Eastern Europe. These companies were both domiciled in low-tax Delaware, and a company controlled by Kussainova, Akem LLC, appears on the incorporation and tax documents associated with Maxwell’s U.S. affiliate.”
Perhaps unbeknownst to Hudson, he told McClatchy that he didn’t think Kussainova had a business relationship with Alibek but that appears to be entirely untrue.
The kicker in all of this is that prosecutors in Kyiv didn’t even file charges against Alibek until February 2018, citing him for being an accessory to money laundering “committed by a criminal group in the process of…laundering millions through Max-Well Corporation.” One has to wonder based on Whitney Webb’s terrifying investigation if there’s more to this story than Ukrainian authorities suddenly uncovering Alibek and Ablyazov’s scheme almost a decade after it occurred.
Disclaimer: Ten thousand more pages of disclaimers to follow.
If you were mentioned in this article because your associate(s) did or said something stupid/dishonest, that’s not a suggestion that you did or said something stupid/dishonest or that you took part in it. Of course, some may conclude on their own that you associate with stupid/dishonest individuals but that’s called having the right to an opinion. If I’ve questioned something that doesn’t make sense to me, that’s not me spinning the confusing material you’ve put out. That’s me trying to make sense out of something that doesn’t make sense. And if I’ve noted that you failed to back up your allegations that means I either missed where you posted it or you failed to back your shiz up.
If I haven’t specifically stated that I believe (my opinion) someone is associated with someone else or an event, then it means just that. I haven’t reported an association nor is there any inference of association on my part. For example, just because someone is mentioned in this article, it doesn’t mean that they’re involved or associated with everyone and everything else mentioned. If I believe that there’s an association between people and/or events, I’ll specifically report it.
If anyone mentioned in this article wants to claim that I have associated them with someone else or an event because I didn’t disclose every single person and event in the world that they are NOT associated with, that’s called gaslighting an audience and it’s absurd hogwash i.e. “They mentioned that I liked bananas but they didn’t disclose that I don’t like apples. Why are they trying to associate me with apples???” Or something similar to this lovely gem, “I did NOT give Trish the thumb drive!” in order to make their lazy audience believe that it was reported they gave Trish the thumb drive when, in fact, that was never reported, let alone inferred.
That’s some of the BS I’m talking about so try not to act like a psychiatric patient, intelligence agent, or paid cyber mercenary by doing these things. If you would like to share your story, viewpoint, or any evidence that pertains to this article, or feel strongly that something needs to be clarified or corrected (again, that actually pertains to the article), you can reach me at email@example.com with any questions or concerns.
I cannot confirm and am not confirming the legitimacy of any messages or emails in this article. Please see a doctor if sensitivity continues. If anyone asks, feel free to tell them that I work for Schoenberger, Fitzgibbon, Steven Biss, the CIA, or really just about any intelligence agency because your idiocy, ongoing defamation, and failure as a human is truly a sight to behold for the rest of us.
If I described you as a fruit basket or even a mental patient it's because that is my opinion of you, it's not a diagnosis. I'm not a psychiatrist nor should anyone take my personal opinions as some sort of clinical assessment. Contact @BellaMagnani if you want a rundown on the psych profile she ran on you.
This is an Op-ed article. The information contained in this post is for general information purposes only. While we endeavor to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information contained on the post for any purpose. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site.
The views or opinions represented in this blog do not represent those of people, institutions or organizations that the owner may or may not be associated with in professional or personal capacity, unless explicitly stated. Any views or opinions are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual.
The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.