September 29, 2020
Nothing unusual to report except that human rights groups and NGOs are still being denied entry to the hearing. The latest from @jlpassarelli, “Day 16 of the #AssangeCase proceedings. By this stage it is very likely that the 40 political observers that the judge arbitrarily banned from the observing proceedings virtually will not be allowed to do so. 4 left & I feel the decision was made before we started.” Richard Medhurst is also reporting now from London and he went to the courthouse today after which he reported that only five people (outside of Assange’s family members) can actually attend the hearing in person. Insane.
And my daily reminder that Belmarsh prison puts Assange through a five-hour ordeal every day just to take him to court which includes being handcuffed, strip-searched, and a three-hour round-trip transport. I’m wondering how many journalists and publishers out there that refuse to speak out on his behalf against this extradition request would feel if the U.S. arrested them tomorrow and put them through this punishment for simply practicing journalism. Especially those who used WikiLeaks documents in the past to bolster their work, image, or publications.
Defense Witness #28: Maureen Baird
According to journalist Mohamed Elmaazi, Maureen Baird spent 28 years working for the U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons after which she was appointed to warden at the Federal Correctional Institution in Danbury, Connecticut. She later became warden at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in NYC where she was eventually promoted to Senior Executive Staff by the U.S. attorney general. Finally, she landed at the U.S. Penitentiary in Marion, Illinois where she oversaw 350 staff members and anywhere from 1200 to 1500 inmates. She is also familiar with Special Administrative Measures known as SAMs. Bottom line, she obviously has the experience when it comes to U.S. federal prisons.
Baird’s Overview of SAMS
- Prisoners spend 23-24 hours a day in their cell and are not allowed to communicate with other inmates
- Prisoners under SAMs are only allowed to call an approved family member once a month as long as its scheduled two weeks in advance—all calls are monitored by the FBI
- It takes months for a letter to get to a prisoner under SAMs (they’re screened)
- No one has ever had SAMs overturned
- Special Administrative Measures cause severe depression, anxiety, paranoia, weight loss, mental health issues
Can SAMs Be Modified?
Everyone under SAMs gets the same treatment and it can’t be changed by the warden. Again, these documents are from the Tsarnaev/Boston bombing case and it shows exactly how Assange would be treated:
- The decision to put someone under admistrative measures involves the DOJ and the CIA
- The final decision lies with the U.S. Attorney General (William Barr)
- The entire point of SAMs is so you don’t/can’t talk to anyone and yet the prosecution tried to argue that the measures can be reduced
- Baird: “If they can speak to other inmates why would they need to be on SAMs?”
Espionage and National Security Threats
- Assange will likely spend the rest of his life in prison due to national security concerns
- The prosecution argued that there are “good reasons” for SAMs (again, national security)
- Note: Assange is being charged with espionage despite publishing overseas, living overseas, and being a foreign citizen
Defense Witness #29: Lindsay A. Lewis
According to @DefenseAssange, Lindsay Lewis is on the board of directors for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and worked on the case of Mostafa Kamel Mostafa (a.k.a. Abu Hamza) who was extradited to the U.S. and imprisoned at Colorado’s ADX Florence maximum-security prison.
Fun fact about Mr. Hamza’s case: The United States told European courts that he wouldn’t be sent to ADX Florence and guess where they sent him after he was extradited? Yup, ADX Florence. He’s been there for five years now (and under SAMs for eight years). “UK and European high courts relied on US representations that Hamza wouldn’t get placed in ADX Florence in deciding to extradite him.” Under cross-examination, the prosecution argued that they told the UK courts they wouldn’t send Hamza to ADX if a medical evaluation basically said he couldn’t manage there. I mean, no one can manage there. Come on.
Cunningham v. Federal Bureau Prisons
Today we heard about Cunningham v. Federal Bureau Prisons again which you might remember came up previously on Day 6 of the hearing.
[The prosecution] also tried to argue that the quality of life in the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has improved due to previous litigation which I think most of us would disagree with including the judge in the Lauri Love case. The lawsuit that James Lewis was referring to is the 2012 case Cunningham v. Federal Bureau Prisons which was filed by inmates at ADX Florence for violating “BOP policy and the Eighth Amendment by failing to properly diagnose and treat prisoners at ADX with serious mental illness” (Univ. of Michigan Law School).
But here’s the dealio: Despite the case resulting in mentally ill patients being moved out of ADX there’s still inmates there that are severely depressed and/or have psychiatric problems. Additionally, if you’re put under SAMs “you get no benefit from the Cunningham settlement.” So the prosecution likes to do a lot of cheerleading for things that either don’t exist in U.S. prisons (in reality) or wouldn’t pertain to Assange.
- Lawyers are restricted when talking to their client (prosecution denied this)
- Limited communication with family/the outside world
- No interaction with other inmates
- You can be in solitary confinement/under SAMs for years
- Again, no one has overturned SAMs
- Going back to Hamza’s case, he violated SAMs because he wished his one-year old grandchild “Happy Birthday” on the phone but the child wasn’t on an approved party list—true story
Suicide and Mental Health Care
- There’s an “extreme shortage” of medical care at ADX Florence
- Again, services that the prosecution read off to Lewis would not apply to Assange under SAMs
All of the defense witnesses who testified about U.S. prisons including where Assange would likely stay both pre- and post-trial have all said how they lack proper mental health care, SAMs would be extremely detrimental on Assange’s health and limit not only his communications but the care he would receive, and the isolation would raises the risk of suicide.
The Twitter users I followed today that I want to give a special thanks to for covering the hearing and that were used as my source material include (these guys and gals do the heavy lifting so we don’t have to):
A head’s up that @SMaurizi will no longer be covering the hearing (for now). Yesterday, the UK prosecution for the United States took issue with her doing so ⟶ “I am afraid today and in the coming days I won’t be able to follow and cover the Julian #Assange extradition hearing because the lawyers acting for the US government asked I won’t do it as I am a witness of fact in the Julian #Assange extradition hearing.” – Stefania Maurizi
Richard Medhurst’s Daily Updates (video) HERE
@AssangeDefense’s Daily Report HERE
“No way out of US Supermax jail unless ‘almost dying’, Assange extradition case told.” Press Association via Press Gazette
“True Crime Chronicles: Inside Colorado’s Supermax Prison.” Daily Blast LIVE (video)
“Julian Assange faces ‘torturous’ months in parking space-sized cell if extradited to US, court hears.” Press Association via Press Gazette
“Julian Assange ‘faces fate worse than death’ in US: WikiLeaks founder could serve life in isolation at dreaded ‘Supermax’ prison that’s home to America’s most violent terrorists and drug lords if extradited, court hears.” Emer Skully via DailyMail
(also see articles below “The Darkest Corner…” and “Conditions of Prison in Alexandria, VA…”)
“How Did We Get Here? The Threat of Fascism in U.S.” Davey Heller via ClassConscious.org
“No more appeals to the fascist Trump! The Assange campaign must turn to the working class!” Davey Heller via ClassConscious.org
“The Darkest Corner: Special Administrative Measures and Extreme Isolation in the Federal Bureau of Prisons.” Center For Constitutional Rights
Conditions of Prison in Alexandria, VA via The Justice Campaign (Twitter thread)
“Wikileaks – USA against Julian Assange (english subtitles)” via ardmediathek.de
- Day 1 and 2: Mark Feldstein
- Day 2: Clive Stafford-Smith
- Day 3: Paul Rogers, Trevor Timm
- Day 4: Eric Lewis (cancelled)
- Day 5: Eric Lewis
- Day 6: Eric Lewis (continued), Thomas Durkin
- Day 7: John Goetz, Daniel Ellsberg
- Day 8: John Sloboda, Carey Shenkman
- Day 9:
- Nicky Hager
- Jennifer Robinson (statement read in court, no cross-examination)
- Khaled El-Masri (statement read in court, no cross-examination)
- Carey Shenkman (continuation from day before)
- Dean Yates (statement read in court, no cross-examination)
- Day 10:
- Christian Grotthoff
- Andy Worthington (statement read by judge/unclear)
- Cassandra Fairbanks (statement read in court, no cross-examination)
- Day 11: Dr. Kopelman
- Day 12:
- Dr. Quinton Deeley
- Seena Fazel
- Dr. Catherine Humphries
- Day 13:
- Dr. Nigel Blackwood
- Dr. Sandra Crosby
- Christopher Butler (statement read in court, no cross-examination)
- John Young (statement read in court, no cross-examination)
- Day 14:
- Jakob Austein
- Patrick Eller
- Day 15:
- Yancy Ellis
- Joel Stickler
- Day 16:
- Maureen Baird
- Lindsay A. Lewis
- Edward Fitzgerald QC (Assange defense)
- Mark Summers QC (Assange defense)
- Jennifer Robinson (Assange defense)
- Gareth Peirce (Assange defense)
- Florence Iveson (Assange defense)
- James Lewis QC (prosecutor for the U.S.)
- Joel Smith (prosecutor for the U.S.)
- Claire Dobbin (prosecutor for the U.S.)
Defense Opening Arguments HERE
Prosecution Skeleton Arguments (photos via @MacWBishop) HERE
Prosecution Witness Bundle Including Kromberg Statement (bundle may be subject to change with each witness) HERE
Defense Witness #2 Statement: Clive Stafford-Smith HERE
Defense Witness #3 Statement: Paul Rogers HERE
Defense Witness #4 Statement: Trevor Timm HERE
Defense Witness #5 Statement: Eric Lewis
Defense Witness #6 Statement: Thomas Durkin
Defense Witness #7 Statement: John Goetz HERE
Defense Witness #8 Statement: Daniel Ellsberg HERE
Defense Witness #9 Statement: John Sloboda HERE
Defense Witness #10 Statement: Carey Shenkman HERE
Defense Witness #11 Statement: Nicky Hager HERE
Defense Witness Statement #12: Jennifer Robinson HERE
Defense Witness #13 Statement : Khaled El-Masri HERE
Defense Witness #14 Statement: Dean Yates HERE
Defense Witness #15 Statement: Christian Grotthoff HERE
Defense Witness #16 Statement: Andy Worthington HERE
Defense Witness #17 Statement: Cassandra Fairbanks HERE
Defense Witness #18 Statement: Dr. Kopelman (not released)
Defense Witness #19 Statement: Dr. Quinton Deeley (not released)
Prosecution Witness #1 Statement: Seena Fazel (not released)
Defense Witness #20: Dr. Catherine Humphries (not released)
Prosecution Witness #2 Statement: Dr. Nigel Blackwood (not released)
Defense Witness #21 Statement: Dr. Sandra Crosby (not released)
Defense Witness #22 Statement: Christopher Butler HERE
Defense Witness #23 Statement: John Young HERE
Defense Witness #24 Statement: Jakob Austein HERE
Defense Witness #25 Statement: Patrick Eller HERE
Defense Witness #26 Statement: Yancy Ellis
Defense Witness #27 Statement: Joel Stickler HERE
Defense Witness #28 Statement: Maureen Baird
Defense Witness #29 Statement: Lindsay A. Lewis
Disclaimer: Ten thousand more pages of disclaimers to follow.
If you were mentioned in this article because your associate(s) did or said something stupid/dishonest, that’s not a suggestion that you did or said something stupid/dishonest or that you took part in it. Of course, some may conclude on their own that you associate with stupid/dishonest individuals but that’s called having the right to an opinion. If I’ve questioned something that doesn’t make sense to me, that’s not me spinning the confusing material you’ve put out. That’s me trying to make sense out of something that doesn’t make sense. And if I’ve noted that you failed to back up your allegations that means I either missed where you posted it or you failed to back your shiz up.
If I haven’t specifically stated that I believe (my opinion) someone is associated with someone else or an event, then it means just that. I haven’t reported an association nor is there any inference of association on my part. For example, just because someone is mentioned in this article, it doesn’t mean that they’re involved or associated with everyone and everything else mentioned. If I believe that there’s an association between people and/or events, I’ll specifically report it.
If anyone mentioned in this article wants to claim that I have associated them with someone else or an event because I didn’t disclose every single person and event in the world that they are NOT associated with, that’s called gaslighting an audience and it’s absurd hogwash i.e. “They mentioned that I liked bananas but they didn’t disclose that I don’t like apples. Why are they trying to associate me with apples???” Or something similar to this lovely gem, “I did NOT give Trish the thumb drive!” in order to make their lazy audience believe that it was reported they gave Trish the thumb drive when, in fact, that was never reported, let alone inferred.
That’s some of the BS I’m talking about so try not to act like a psychiatric patient, intelligence agent, or paid cyber mercenary by doing these things. If you would like to share your story, viewpoint, or any evidence that pertains to this article, or feel strongly that something needs to be clarified or corrected (again, that actually pertains to the article), you can reach me at email@example.com with any questions or concerns.
I cannot confirm and am not confirming the legitimacy of any messages or emails in this article. Please see a doctor if sensitivity continues. If anyone asks, feel free to tell them that I work for Schoenberger, Fitzgibbon, Steven Biss, the CIA, or really just about any intelligence agency because your idiocy, ongoing defamation, and failure as a human is truly a sight to behold for the rest of us.
If I described you as a fruit basket or even a mental patient it's because that is my opinion of you, it's not a diagnosis. I'm not a psychiatrist nor should anyone take my personal opinions as some sort of clinical assessment. Contact @BellaMagnani if you want a rundown on the psych profile she ran on you.
This is an Op-ed article. The information contained in this post is for general information purposes only. While we endeavor to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information contained on the post for any purpose. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site.
The views or opinions represented in this blog do not represent those of people, institutions or organizations that the owner may or may not be associated with in professional or personal capacity, unless explicitly stated. Any views or opinions are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual.
The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.