Part One → “WikiLeaks’ Quest of Random Clues”
DAY THREE: OCTOBER 6, 2018
So the first thing I noticed yesterday was that WikiLeaks is giving us what I call “numbered clues” vs. what appears to be “unnumbered hints” (I went back and renumbered clues in my previous post). For instance, on day three, WikiLeaks posted the above unnumbered picture of a weather buoy located in an area called Null Island. According to Wikipedia, Null Island is “around the point where the prime meridian and the equator cross,” more specifically at zero degrees latitude and longitude in the Gulf of Guinea. It’s called a “fictional island,” because there isn’t any actual land there so it’s not entirely surprisingly that it doesn’t show up in Google maps.
Described as an “apparition” yet a “hive of activity in the world of geographic information systems (GIS),” the area serves as a landing ground for mapping mistakes. According to The Wall Street Journal, “…1,708,031 misguided location requests in the Mapzen system” were rerouted to Null Island in just one day. And Michal Migurski of Mapzen stated, “One of the reasons that Null Island became such a popular joke is that you are seeing the data-processing world and the geographers’ world bump into each other for the first time.” This reminded me of Julian Assange’s last appearance where he spoke about how in the digital and A.I. world, there are no longer physical boundaries between countries (forgive me if that’s not the right video).
The fact that WikiLeaks chose this fictional location fits perfectly with some of their clues and tweets: “Mythic airplanes,” ghost planes at Shannon airport, shapes with hidden colors, animals that remain largely hidden (moles), and spying (Chinese microchips). I previously quoted Sara Brady who used the words “visibility and invisibility” to describe Shannon airport but couldn’t that be used to describe what’s in WikiLeaks’ hints and clues so far?
As for the buoy seen in WikiLeaks tweet it’s an ATLAS buoy from the Pilot Research Moored Array in the tropical Atlantic (PIRATA) program. The program consists of a “network of deep ocean moored buoys in the tropical Atlantic” and was developed as a “multinational observation network by Brazil, France, and the United States.”
But getting back to my point about clues vs. hints, since this particular buoy is in the Gulf of Guinea I want to point out that besides breaking down WikiLeaks’ first clue (357175638, 1395349266) to latitude and longitude points on a map that take us to the Canon building in Tokyo, if you move the decimal points, it also takes you somewhere in the Gulf of Guinea that looks particularly close to Null Island.
Playing with the coordinates will also land you in Kenya, Niger, Sudan, Cameroon, Algeria, somewhere between Papua and Guam, and right next door to Malta. So it looks to me like we shouldn’t discredit Africa just yet, especially in light of Benghazi, Hillary’s new Libya, and the Gulf of Guinea where China (CNPC), ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell, BP, and Chevron have long held an interest (oil).
And speaking of Killary, @AnonScan tweeted this out on October 5, 2018, and I’m not sure if it has to do with WikiLeaks’ clues or not. My guess is that they’re referring to WikiLeaks’ birthday and the screenshot they posted looks exactly like the typecast used in WikiLeaks’ published emails. However, I couldn’t find it (maybe someone else can?) so I could be wrong. As to what WikiLeaks’ followers missed or the meaning behind lizard people, secure servers, and CMS (which could stand for “Hacking and Content Management System), you’re on your own. And just for you bloggers out there, WordPress appears to be the most hacked content management system “on record.” So there’s that (picture a “thinking face” emoji inserted right about here).
The reason I bring up this tweet (besides the fact it might have something to do with WikiLeaks’ clues) is because they added a second tweet that links to older tweets about Hillary Clinton and her emails, the Clinton Foundation, Abedin, China (accessing her emails), Benghazi, and Julian Assange’s statement, “Our source is not the Russian Government,” to Russian allegations.
For a simple explanation about Null Island see this three-minute video, “The Busiest Place That Doesn’t Exist.”
So here’s our second hint, not clue. Going back to those coordinates from WikiLeaks’ first clue, as noted previously they take you to a Canon building in Tokyo, Japan. Within thirty minutes of WikiLeaks’ tweet above, someone on Twitter realized that the picture is the same building from the Tokyo coordinates. Everyone seems to agree that this is the Canon West Tokyo Data Center because sometimes a picture, especially one taken directly from Canon’s own website, doesn’t lie.
So what exactly does the center do? According to Canon,
“As the core base of the data center business and cloud services, we provide state-of-the-art facilities, state-of-the-art security equipment, and optimal operation services that meet customer needs.”
And just to keep you up to speed, online sleuths believe WikiLeaks has now dropped clues about three data centers:
- The above Canon West Tokyo Data Center (which provides cloud services)
- The GTT Communications Hibernia Atlantic Dublin International Exchange Center (which provides cloud services) based on this WikiLeaks’ clue,
- United Layer, a private cloud network, located at 200 Paul Ave., Suite 110, San Francisco, California based on hex codes found in the colors of this WikiLeaks’ clue.
Yeah, so here’s our next clue and no, I have no idea what this means minus the fact they’re probably talking about the United States Consulate General. One Twitter user, however, totally nailed the clue by finding these the clue’s statements in Wikileaks documents:
- “He is a smooth, knowledgeable operator.” (here)
- “Congen has located two firms…” (here)
- “…their fingers burned before…” (here)
- “Spokesman declined to speculate on possibility of agreement…” (here)
Bingo. The smooth operator in the first email is Brazilian banker Mauricio Schulman. In the second email, the two firms that Congen had “located” were Brazil’s Soma Equipamentos Industrials SA and Temat Ltda. Rrepresentacoes Tecnicas. Canadians were the ones who got their fingers burned and the spokesman who declined to speculate was in reference to an agreement between Brazil and Argentina.
What any of that means, I have no idea. With any luck, we’ll get a hint.
DAY FOUR: OCTOBER 7, 2018
WikiLeaks’ third hint was an aerial view of the Hibernia Atlantic Dublin International Exchange Center at the Clonshaugh Industrial Estate in Dublin. This obviously relates back to their clue about Shannon airport where the CIA spends their time running rendition planes. At the Exchange you’ll find GTT Communications (cloud services), Magnet Networks (cloud services), Metronet UK Ltd., and North West Electronics.
Oh, and look at that. Amazon subsidiary, Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd. (cloud services) is doing their thing there, too. Visible but not visible. Irishtimes.com has posted a handful of articles about the subsidiary here (thanks @BellaMagnani).
WikiLeaks last hint so far today appears to be an aerial view of United Layer which online users already found using the hex codes in Clue Three’s shapes.
I’m pretty sure that @welltraveledfox nailed this clue with this, a link to a PGP wordlist that has all of the words WikiLeaks used above on it. The only thing I know is that the words can be converted to “5D A4 C6 C9 F2 E6 OC 6B F2 24 CF A5 7B 22 33 79 E1 65 7D 4D,” and yes, I realize this isn’t very helpful. When I get more, I’ll update.
SO JUST TO RECAP
Honestly, this whole thing is fairly easy to understand once you know how it’s structured: Numbered clues are being dropped and then hints follow to support each clue. My guess is that we’ll be seeing hints to Clue 4 and Clue 5 in the next day. The question is what does it all mean although I think we should keep in mind the whole invisible vs. visible thing: Moles tend to be underground (unseen), rendition planes (Shannon airport), Amazon (secretly?) working at the Exchange, colors and hex codes hidden in shapes, and hackers etc. etc. So what’s hiding in the United Layer building, the WikiLeaks documents, and the PGP word list clues? My guess: Data.
Okay, so whatever. I’m not sure if my compilation so far has made any sense so I’ve simplified it below with what we have so far. If I’ve made any mistakes, let me know and I’ll correct it.
Drawing of a mole that dates back to WikiLeaks’ beginnings. Code included in tweet breaks down to lat and long points in both Tokyo and the Gulf of Guinea.
HINT 1: Picture of buoy located in the Gulf of Guinea (Null Island). Relates back to Clue One. Hashtags: #QuestOfRandomClues #treasurehunt
HINT 2: Photo of the Canon West Tokyo Data Center building located in Tokyo. Relates back to Clue One. Hashtag: #QuestOfRandomClues
Everyone originally thought this was about the Shannon Airport where the U.S. uses rendition planes (okay not everyone, @welltraveledfox was on top of this and I should have listened). However, the clue is related to the GTT Communications Hibernia Atlantic Dublin International Exchange Center in Dublin.
HINT 3: Aerial view of the Hibernia Atlantic Dublin International Exchange Center at the Clonshaugh Industrial Estate in Dublin. Relates back to Clue Two.
Picture of colored shapes; star, circle, circle, star, star, star, circle. Hex colors used in photo may be related to United Layer in San Francisco. #QuestofRandomClues
HINT 4: An aerial photo of the building where data company United Layer resides. Relates back to Clue Three.
The four lines in the clue appear in four different WikiLeaks documents. For those documents go here.
HINT: None yet.
The tweet appears to contain words from a PGP word list. It translates to “5D A4 C6 C9 F2 E6 OC 6B F2 24 CF A5 7B 22 33 79 E1 65 7D 4D.”
HINT: None yet.
See Part 3: “WikiLeaks Quest of Random Clues FULL UPDATE”
Disclaimer: Ten thousand more pages of disclaimers to follow.
If you were mentioned in this article because your associate(s) did or said something stupid/dishonest, that’s not a suggestion that you did or said something stupid/dishonest or that you took part in it. Of course, some may conclude on their own that you associate with stupid/dishonest individuals but that’s called having the right to an opinion. If I’ve questioned something that doesn’t make sense to me, that’s not me spinning the confusing material you’ve put out. That’s me trying to make sense out of something that doesn’t make sense. And if I’ve noted that you failed to back up your allegations that means I either missed where you posted it or you failed to back your shiz up.
If I haven’t specifically stated that I believe (my opinion) someone is associated with someone else or an event, then it means just that. I haven’t reported an association nor is there any inference of association on my part. For example, just because someone is mentioned in this article, it doesn’t mean that they’re involved or associated with everyone and everything else mentioned. If I believe that there’s an association between people and/or events, I’ll specifically report it.
If anyone mentioned in this article wants to claim that I have associated them with someone else or an event because I didn’t disclose every single person and event in the world that they are NOT associated with, that’s called gaslighting an audience and it’s absurd hogwash i.e. “They mentioned that I liked bananas but they didn’t disclose that I don’t like apples. Why are they trying to associate me with apples???” Or something similar to this lovely gem, “I did NOT give Trish the thumb drive!” in order to make their lazy audience believe that it was reported they gave Trish the thumb drive when, in fact, that was never reported, let alone inferred.
That’s some of the BS I’m talking about so try not to act like a psychiatric patient, intelligence agent, or paid cyber mercenary by doing these things. If you would like to share your story, viewpoint, or any evidence that pertains to this article, or feel strongly that something needs to be clarified or corrected (again, that actually pertains to the article), you can reach me at email@example.com with any questions or concerns.
I cannot confirm and am not confirming the legitimacy of any messages or emails in this article. Please see a doctor if sensitivity continues. If anyone asks, feel free to tell them that I work for Schoenberger, Fitzgibbon, Steven Biss, the CIA, or really just about any intelligence agency because your idiocy, ongoing defamation, and failure as a human is truly a sight to behold for the rest of us.
If I described you as a fruit basket or even a mental patient it's because that is my opinion of you, it's not a diagnosis. I'm not a psychiatrist nor should anyone take my personal opinions as some sort of clinical assessment. Contact @BellaMagnani if you want a rundown on the psych profile she ran on you.
This is an Op-ed article. The information contained in this post is for general information purposes only. While we endeavor to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information contained on the post for any purpose. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site.
The views or opinions represented in this blog do not represent those of people, institutions or organizations that the owner may or may not be associated with in professional or personal capacity, unless explicitly stated. Any views or opinions are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual.
The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.