For The Police Story Part 1 → HERE
The Laurel/Dexter shootout cont’d:
(Continuation of the attempt to recreate the Laurel Ave. shootout in Watertown using mostly first-hand accounts from the officers that were at the scene.)
Trooper Dumont left the MIT shooting crime scene and when he arrived in Watertown at Dexter Ave. and Fairfield, he reported no police activity whatsoever. Remember Officer Colon who said he drove his car between Sergeant MacLellan’s and Reynolds’ cruisers? Third guy on the scene? This is about when he shows up – so he was the third Watertown cop on scene, but not the third cop on scene. When Officer Colon showed up, Trooper Dumont got out of his car and it was then he smelled gun odor and heard gunshots. He then followed “other police” (this included Colon but no idea who else) to the intersection of Laurel and Dexter where Officer Colon’s car was then struck by gunfire (although Colon failed to mention this in his interview).
After bullets struck Colon’s car, Dumont witnessed an explosion. Bomb #1, 2, 3, 4? Who knows. Interestingly, Trooper Dumont noted that after the bomb detonation he fully suspected at that point that they were dealing with the Boston bombers. From Dumont’s position he could not see the suspects so he moved in front of 131-133 Dexter Ave where Cambridge Police Detective James Diggins joined him. Shortly after this he heard another explosion and moved to the northeast corner of Dexter and Laurel. I suspect this is around the area of the tree where MacLellan had hidden earlier. Dumont could see Tamerlan shooting at the police and he heard a third explosion and saw more cop cars convening on the scene. Something to note in Dumont’s narrative: At this point he heard officers yell that the suspects had entered backyards and were escaping. Huh. Escaping, eh?
So Trooper Dumont eventually hears a fourth explosion which he reported was the pressure cooker bomb. That puts us at four bombs total that Dumont heard. There were five thrown during the shootout. It appears that Watertown Officer Joe Reynolds and Sergeant MacLellan may have been the only ones that saw the first bomb that exploded while other officers only heard and saw the second, third, fourth and fifth bombs. That’s all splendid and all but, unfortunately, Sergeant MacLellan stated during his WEEI interview that the Tsarnaevs had deployed five bombs but only three exploded. Jahar’s indictment states that the Tsarnaev brothers travelled to Watertown with five IEDs but only used four of them. Ah…the details.
Watertown officers agreed that the next Watertown officer that arrived on scene was Sergeant Jeff Pugliese (although this article from Boston.com states that Officer Michael Comick was the fourth guy on scene, not Pugliese). Sergeant Pugliese was the officer that pulled the stealth move by running behind yards to sneak up on the Tsarnaevs’ left side. When he got to the brothers he saw their feet movements behind one of the vehicles so he decided to take “skip shots” at them – hoping to take them out in their lower legs, ankles. If Pugliese was to their left side and he only saw their feet wouldn’t that mean that Tamerlan and Jahar were standing on the side of their cars? How did they not get shot five thousand times? This is how I picture it: Anyhoo…apparently they did not get shot (Were they hiding behind the Mercedes door? Absolutely, if this article hadn’t quoted Pugliese as saying, “I could see Tamerlan and Dzhokhar in front of the black Mercedes. I could see muzzle flashes from both sides of the vehicle…”) and Tamerlan finally noticed Sergeant Pugliese to his side. Tamerlan ran towards him, both men engaged in gunfire. How far apart where they? Oh…about six to eight feet. Uh huh. And neither one shot the other, m’kay? Pugliese eventually ran out of bullets and Tamerlan’s gun stopped working so Tamerlan suggested best out of three, rock, paper, scissors. Pugliese was having no part of it so Tamerlan allegedly hightailed it out there and decided a quick sprint down the road towards the firing squad was the best course of action (you know that rock, paper thing was a joke, right?). What had Jahar been doing this whole time? Eh, no one’s ever said. Apparently it’s not important.
After Tamerlan began running down the street, it wasn’t a barrage of bullets that took him down. It was Sergeant Pugliese, who ran after him and tackled him (and everyone take note that the police did shoot Tamerlan a multitude of times but somehow Pugliese dodged every bullet). At this point in the Lawrence O’Donnell interview, the interview seems to cut out the last question asked by O’Donnell (which was probably, “How the heck did 8-9 bullets NOT stop Tamerlan??”) because Pugliese’s next comment was Tamerlan was not thrown back 10-15 feet, that “it’s not like the movies” and that “people can take the bullets and keep on fighting.”
Really, Pugliese? Is that the reality of what happens when people get shot? (Warning: These videos are graphic) Here’s a video where Evan Ebel shot Deputy James Boyd three times during a traffic stop while the deputy was wearing a vest, no less. Here’s another officer that couldn’t take the bullets, as Pugliese so eloquently put it. And another cop. And another. These are horrible, horrible videos that show what can happen to vest-wearing police officers when they are shot. Furthermore, Tamerlan wasn’t wearing a vest and it’s not like he had just enjoyed a party bowl of bath salts. In fact, he wasn’t high on anything for that matter so I’ll be perfectly frank. Pugliese’s comments that people just keep on truckin’ after being shot eight to nine times like Tamerlan was disgusts me. Are we really to believe that that is the real reality of gun violence? Ask the victims of the Aurora theater shooting who buried their loved ones if that’s their reality. As Officer Collier’s family if that’s their reality. Or the victims of the Boston bombing. Uh uh. That sh*t don’t fly on my blog. Ugh. Moving on…
So Pugliese tackled Tamerlan and Sergeant MacLellan jumped in on the action because, you know, Tamerlan had a bomb strapped to him and MacLellan wasn’t going to give the guy a chance to detonate that puppy (Isn’t it interesting that MacLellan regurgitated the same story about his fear of Tamerlan having a bomb strapped to him in every single interview and then we saw the same story printed by the media? Yeah. Wonder where that came from). I am assuming that the police had shot Tamerlan twelve dozen times at this point but Pugliese and MacLellan maintain that not only was Tamerlan still alive but that he struggled against the two officers trying to put his hands in handcuffs. Oh. Okay. They continued to try to cuff Tamerlan so they could check if he had any bombs on him. Or did they? According to the Bostonglobe.com it was not MacLellan and Pugliese holding down Tamerlan, it was a Boston cop by the name of Jared Gero. Boston police chief, Dan Linskey, apparently joined Officer Gero and the two of them “ripped Tsarnaev’s clothes from his body, frisking him for an explosive device. They found none.” Huh. M’kay.
While whatever was going on with Tamerlan, Jahar had gotten back in the Mercedes SUV and had turned it around so it was facing the officers and Tamerlan (Did he back up the SUV and then do the u-turn or did he drive up and around past the Honda Civic and do a u-turn? Did he pull into a driveway and then back up and turn around? Why no mention about this? Not a big deal?). As whomever (Pugliese, MacLellan, Gero, Linskey) was trying to cuff Tamerlan, the Mercedes SUV barreled towards them. I thought I had read that Jahar had used the pressure cooker bomb as a decoy so he could get into the Mercedes but no one mentions this during the part of the story where police were trying to handcuff Tamerlan. MacLellan told Pugliese to disengage and MacLellan “pushed off the body.” (The body? So he was dead). Tamerlan apparently was still not handcuffed at this point and Pugliese, in this interview, stated, “I was trying to pull him [Tamerlan} out of the street…Sgt. MacLellan had retreated to a position of cover…the headlights were right here in my face, and I had to let go of Tamerlan.”
After the SUV dragged Tamerlan for a distance (for an exact measurement it depends on
which interview you watch or what news story you read), Pugliese and Reynolds attempted to handcuff Tamerlan because, you know, there was a point at that point. Tamerlan had been shot 8-9 times and dragged under a SUV vehicle anywhere from 25-50 feet and he was, according to MacLellan, Reynolds and Pugliese, still alive! Of course he was. And folks, he wasn’t just alive, he was still wrestling against being handcuffed. And still wrestling after Officer Reynolds got him handcuffed! Good lord, for real? In the WEEI interview, MacLellan and Reynolds may have admitted what we have all assumed when they agreed with the interviewer that there was “no reason” at that point to take Tamerlan to the hospital. Yeah. Because he was already dead.
It was right before Jahar took off in the Mercedes that many of the officers heard “officer down” and the fight to save Office Donohue, who’s femoral artery had been severed by a bullet, began.
Up next: Boston Bombing Day 5 Cont’d: The Police Story Part 3
This is an Op-ed article. The information contained in this post is for general information purposes only. While we endeavor to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information contained on the post for any purpose. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site.
The views or opinions represented in this blog do not represent those of people, institutions or organizations that the owner may or may not be associated with in professional or personal capacity, unless explicitly stated. Any views or opinions are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual.
The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.