Thursday, April 18, 2013
The day started out with US Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano announcing that the FBI had interest in two men seen on surveillance tapes. She didn’t say they were suspects exactly…so…what? They wanted to have a little chit chat with these guys? And Obama spent the day giving speeches in Colorado, “Your resolve is the greatest rebuke to those who committed this heinous act…,” yadda, yadda, yadda.
Folks, let’s just get to the afternoon’s meat and potatoes –
The FBI press conference.
The FBI held a press conference where they disclosed photos of two men (suspect #1 and suspect #2) they believed to be the suspects of the Bostom bombing. I quote from the conference:
“Suspect 2 set down a backpack at the site of the second explosion just in front of the Forum restaurant.”
The Forum Restaurant is located at 755 Boylston Street. If you look at the Google map below you’ll see a business to the left of Starbucks named Vox. Vox is no longer there and Forum Restaurant is now currently in that location. This is where the FBI is saying “suspect 2,” which will later turn out to be Dzhokhar Tsamaev, set down his bag. And yes, that is the building on which the man was seen and photographed on the roof. And no, the FBI did not say suspect #2 put the backpack/bomb in a trash can. Rather, he just “set it down.” Which makes you wonder about the runner I previously posted about who swore he saw the second bomb explode – it had been placed in a trash can.
The FBI goes on to say at the conference,
“As you can see, the quality of the photos is quite good but we will continue on developing additional images to improve their identification value. Further, on FBI.gov we have photos of the suspects.”
“The photos and videos are posted for the public and media to use, review and publicize.”
“For clarity, these images should be the only ones, and I emphasize the only ones, that the public should view to assist us. Other photos should not be deemed credible and they unnecessarily divert the public’s attention in the wrong direction and create undue work for vital law enforcement resources.”
“For 100 years, the FBI has relied on the public to be it’s eyes and ears.” (Really? Hmmm…so the need for the Patriot Act was…?)
“Somebody out there knows these individuals…Though it may be difficult, the nation’s counting on those with information to come forward to provide it to us.”
(The nation’s counting on it? What is this? Sunday school guilt? I shouldn’t have to expect my fellow citizens to solve this. I expect the FBI, with all of it’s tools at it’s disposal to be able to do this job without every citizen calling in on a tip line. Just saying. Oh wait, that’s right. The FBI *has* already done that job and knows who these guys are…another time, another post.)
If you would like to watch the press conference in it’s entirety go here ➤ Youtube
Okay, now the evening’s meat and potatoes and, folks, here’s where things get tricky –
7-Eleven. MIT. Officer down. Carjackings. Kidnappings. ATM machines.
The initial story we all heard about Thursday night after we woke up on Friday was that the bombing suspects had robbed a 7-Eleven store located at 750 Massachusetts, Cambridge. Boston Police released a photo of suspect #2 caught on the 7-Eleven surveillance tape (seen to the left).
Nah. I’m just kidding. They didn’t rob the store. Margaret Chabris, the Director of Corporate Communications for 7-Eleven had this to say:
“The suspect in the photos for that particular 7-Eleven robbery looks nothing like the suspects. The police or someone made a mistake. Someone was confused.”
Margaret has also been quoted as saying that the surveillance video of the crime was not taken at a 7-Eleven. What does that mean? And why did the media put it out there that these suspects had robbed a 7-Eleven? Two words. Timothy Alben. It seems that State Police Superintendent Timothy Alben stated at a press conference that the suspect (or suspects, which we find out later are two brothers) did rob the store. But 7-Eleven maintained they didn’t rob the store. At an evening press conference on Friday, Alben retracted his original report and said that the suspects were at the 7-Eleven around the same time it was robbed.
So the suspects just happened to be there around the same time as a robbery? Hence the reason authorites just “happened” to get this suspect on surveillance tape? I mean, can you figure out the odds of this happening? Or is it that someone called in a tip that the suspect was at the store and we haven’t heard a peep about it? If no one called it in then this is one of the most extraordinary coincidences I’ve ever seen.
But you know what? Thank goodness the police posted this picture from the 7-Eleven. If they hadn’t we might not have a “hot off the presses” interview with the suspect’s mechanic. Apparently once this guy saw the 7-Eleven surveillance tape photo of the suspect, he immediately recognized him. In his interview the mechanic claims that the suspect (Later id’d as Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. By the way, I’m totally shortening this guy’s name to DzT. Sorry, but it’s totally going down like that. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev = Suspect #2 = DzT. Mmmhmm. Suspect #1? DzT’s brother. Got it? Got it.) came in to pick up his girlfriend’s Mercedes the day after the bombings. WATCH
After the suspects didn’t rob a 7-Eleven store, oh wait, before they didn’t rob a 7-Eleven store, according to USNews.com on April 19, they shot a MIT officer and stole his cruiser.
“….when the suspects approached a police officer from Massachusetts Institute of Technology and shot him in the head.
The two then stole the officer’s cruiser, robbed a nearby 7-Eleven…”
And nymag.com reported:
“At 10:20pm on Thursday, the active manhunt started: Police received reports of gunshots in the vicinity of Vassar Street and Main Street on the MIT campus, and ten minutes later found officer Sean Collier dead of multiple gunshot wounds in his patrol car.
Collier’s gun remained in its holster, and there was no sign he had fired any shots. Early reports struggled to find any reason for the killing of Collier, sometimes placing the murder in the same sentence as a convenience store robbery that happened around the same time.”
MIT’s website reported:
“Collier was shot Thursday evening following an altercation at the corner of Vassar Street and Main Street in Cambridge, roughly between Building 32 (Strata Center) and Building 76 (David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research) on the MIT campus. He was transported to Massachusetts General Hospital, where he was pronounced dead.”
Secondly, let’s go to the Boston Police radio tapes. Well, my recording of the police radio. And folks, I’m not going to lie – I don’t have any real times on this recording. *Sigh* I know, I know. But I’ll list the mark times as they occur in my recording. I have taken out a lot of the dead air, etc. off the recording. The recording is 4 minutes, 17 seconds long but realize these conversations took place over approximately a 20 minute period. I believe this stuff pertains to the shooting and the 7-Eleven robbery – but be aware, some of it may not.
0:01: At the start of the recording, an officer talks about how someone must have called in and said that they saw an officer just sitting there and were wondering what the “noise” was.
0:18: Someone says, “Get the mobile units down there and see if they can find him.”
0:26: Office down.
0:40: Officer and dispatch mention streets Magnolia and Dudley.
1:06: ::indistinguishable:: “telling me what we hear”…::indistinguishable::…”was some kind of gunshot.”
1:40: “Give me a description.”
1:44: “Black male, about 120, wearing black clothing, that’s all we have right now.
2:02: “…armed robbery earlier at the 7-Eleven…white male, 200 lbs., 5’11, dark jacket and cowboy hat. That’s not the suspect in this as far as I can tell.”
2:35: “Officer shot…suspect still at large with his weapon…I believe it to be the area of … memorial. The actual incident was on Vassar Street.
2:54: “Black male, 120 pounds, 5’5, wearing dark clothing and it should be a black Northface jacket.
3:08: Officer states that MIT police are going back to look at two surveillance cameras that were right there at the incident in order to get a better description.
3:22: Officer describes suspect as Hispanic male wearing a cowboy hat and last seen on Vassar.
3:37: Same Officer: “Suspect is a Hispanic male last seen wearing a cowboy hat. This happened on Vassar street in Cambridge and suspect fled in unknown direction. Again, that was in the last 10 minutes.”
You can listen to the recording here ➤ Boston Police Radio: MIT Officer Down
According to the police tapes 1. It sure sounds like the 7-Eleven robbery occurred before the MIT shooting. What time was DzT seen on tape? 2. It sounds like they’re saying that the guy who robbed the 7-Eleven had a cowboy hat on. And he’s white…and 200 pounds. So why does another officer say the suspect was Hispanic, last seen wearing a cowboy hat and last seen on Vassar approx. 10 minutes after the shooting? And 3. Black male? About 120 lbs? Northface jacket? Is this suspect from the MIT shooting? Was there a Hispanic male and a white male that were both wearing cowboy hats, both seen on Vassar after the shooting and both may or may not have robbed a 7-Eleven? 4. Were both brothers at the 7-Eleven and involved with the shooting at MIT? And finally 5. How did State Police Superintendent Timothy Alben get it wrong in a press conference (hours later) that the suspects had robbed the 7-Eleven? The descriptions don’t even match the suspects they were looking for that night.
This picture to the right seems to show DzT’s brother walking in behind him. See the hat he’s wearing? Is that considered a cowboy hat to witnesses? A later picture taken at an ATM machine shows DzT wearing his brother’s hat. So it appears they were both at the 7-Eleven. Why did they head down to MIT? Why kill a cop just sitting in his car? Where they both there when the officer was shot? What?
You thought I was going to clear all of this up for you, didn’t you?
Okay, moving on with the MIT shooting. Originally, some news reports stated that the officer was ambushed in his car and that the car was stolen. But Nymag.com reported that the officer was found in his car. I have to go with the suspects did not steal this guy’s cruiser. If the officer had been shot and his cruiser stolen, why would someone make a call to the police wondering what all the noise was and why an officer was just “sitting there.” Reports said the officer, I believe, was shot numerous times including in the head so wouldn’t the officer be “laying there” with no car in sight? Wouldn’t the caller have said that an officer was laying in the middle of the courtyard in what looked to be a pool of blood? Seriously. No one stole the car. Second of all, there’s no mention of a stolen police car on the radio.
Two weeks later, the media is now reporting that the suspect(s) may have killed the officer in order to get his gun. But they didn’t take it. It was still on the officer at the scene – or was it? Recent articles suggest that the gun was still on the officer and the theory is that the suspect(s) couldn’t get the gun out of the holster. But go back and listen to the police tape at mark 2:35. Are they saying the suspect is at large with his own weapon or with the officer’s weapon. No idea.
So what do we have so far?
1. DzT was at the 7-Eleven based solely on one surveillance tape photo that was released by the police. He apparently was there around the time a robbery took place.
2. Someone not fitting the description of DzT or DzT’s older brother (Remember, he is Suspect #1) shot and killed a MIT police officer after the 7-Eleven was robbed. (Of course there is always the possibility of other police channels being used in that first 20 minutes. We may not have heard that they radio’d about other suspects’ descriptions that did fit DzT or his brother. Also, I am not sure if the MIT surveillance tapes had been looked at by the time my recording ended.)
“Is there more? Is there more?” you ask? Oh yeah. There’s more.
The Boston Globe has an amazingly detailed interview with a man who was carjacked and kidnapped by the bombing suspects. And no, he won’t use his real name nor go on camera. According to “Danny” all went down like this (my summary via The Boston Globe):
Approximately 15-30 minutes after a MIT officer was shot, Danny received a text message. He pulled his Mercedes SUV to the side of Brighton Avenue to return the text. While pulled over, an old sedan pulled up behind him, slamming on the brakes. A man in dark clothes got out, approached Danny, began speaking and knocked on his window. When Danny lowered his window to hear the man, the man reached in, unlocked the doors and hopped in. The man had a gun.
The guy asked Danny if he was familiar with the bombings that had taken place and then admitted he was behind them. He also admitted he killed a police officer in Cambridge earlier. Danny was ordered to drive and the old sedan followed behind them. They eventually went to a neighborhood in East Watertown where Danny got into the passenger seat. Before leaving, DzT, who had been driving the old sedan, and his older brother (suspect 2), loaded things from the sedan into Danny’s Mercedes.
Both brothers then got into the Mercedes SUV and at some point discussed going to New York. For two brothers that had lived in the States for years, amazingly the older brother asked if Danny’s car could be driven into another state such as New York. What? At one point they stopped at Watertown Center so DzT could use an ATM machine using Danny’s card.
DzT’s brother told Danny that both of them (the brothers) had guns but Danny had only seen one. Danny said that at one point they were heading west on Route 20 when it was noticed that the gas was nearly on empty. They stopped at one station but it was closed. They turned around and headed back to the Watertown neighborhood where the old sedan was parked. The suspects grabbed a few more things from the car. Then they headed to get more gas. They arrived at the Shell Food Mart on Memorial Drive. As DzT went inside to pay for the gas, Danny made his move and escaped to a Mobil gas station across the street.
The Boston Globe’s article states that Danny’s ordeal lasted 90 minutes.
One discrepancy I have found is from the dailymail.co.uk (not sure how accurate they are on all of this). Dailymail interviewed the guy who was allegedly working at the Shell station. His name is Mohammed Malah, 46. Mohammed claims that he didn’t pay attention to DzT when he came into the station and that he only realized later after FBI swarmed the place. The article goes on to say, “They [FBI] had been alerted to the garage stop by the carjacking victim who had managed to escape and run across the road to a neighboring Mobil garage.” Okay, so that makes you think that Mohammed definitely worked at the Shell, right?
But earlier in the article they state that DzT went inside the shell where he was captured on CCTV camera and that that photograph was released by the FBI to the public. But wasn’t that the 7-Eleven picture? The owner of the Shell, Alan Mendick, stated, “The police came and we went through the CCTV footage.” And, “Yes, one of them came in here, but I am told before he could buy anything his brother came and hammered on the window and told him they had to go. He had some stuff in his hands but he just put it down and left. There are reports that he was shoplifting, but that’s not true.” (Okay, so we’re definitely at the Shell Station, right?)
But then he adds, “They took the CCTV footage. The picture of the Tsarnaev in the grey hoodie was from the camera at the front door. Everyone who comes in is filmed, it is part of the security you have when open all night.” (Now it sounds like the 7-Eleven.)
Am I missing something here? Am I missing this released photo from the Shell station?
Let’s map this bad boy:
I not sure why my map looks differently than a lot of the maps created by media sources out there. Most news sources have Danny being carjacked where the MIT officer was shot. I have it mapped out according the where Danny said he was carjacked. Point D. is a general mark in East Watertown. I have no idea if they were in that exact spot.
Next up: Day 5: The Car Chase, the Suspects, The Capture
For Day 5 of the Boston Bombing go ➤ HERE
This is an Op-ed article. The information contained in this post is for general information purposes only. While we endeavor to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information contained on the post for any purpose. The owner of this blog makes no representations as to the accuracy or completeness of any information on this site or found by following any link on this site.
The views or opinions represented in this blog do not represent those of people, institutions or organizations that the owner may or may not be associated with in professional or personal capacity, unless explicitly stated. Any views or opinions are not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, or individual.
The owner will not be liable for any errors or omissions in this information nor for the availability of this information. The owner will not be liable for any losses, injuries, or damages from the display or use of this information.